Literature DB >> 33446796

Shifts in honeybee foraging reveal historical changes in floral resources.

Laura Jones1,2, Georgina L Brennan3, Abigail Lowe1,2, Simon Creer2, Col R Ford1, Natasha de Vere4,5.   

Abstract

Decreasing floral resources as a result of habitat loss is one of the key factors in the decline of pollinating insects worldwide. Understanding which plants pollinators use is vital to inform the provision of appropriate floral resources to help prevent pollinator loss. Using a globally important pollinator, the honeybee, we show how changes in agricultural intensification, crop use and the spread of invasive species, have altered the nectar and pollen sources available in the UK. Using DNA metabarcoding, we analysed 441 honey samples from 2017 and compared these to a nationwide survey of honey samples from 1952. We reveal that shifts in major plants foraged by honeybees are driven by changes in the availability of these plants within the landscape. Improved grasslands are the most widespread habitat type in the UK, and management changes within this habitat have the greatest potential to increase floral resource availability.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33446796      PMCID: PMC7809426          DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-01562-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Biol        ISSN: 2399-3642


  21 in total

Review 1.  Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers.

Authors:  Dave Goulson; Elizabeth Nicholls; Cristina Botías; Ellen L Rotheray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Dancing bees communicate a foraging preference for rural lands in high-level agri-environment schemes.

Authors:  Margaret J Couvillon; Roger Schürch; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers.

Authors:  Simon G Potts; Jacobus C Biesmeijer; Claire Kremen; Peter Neumann; Oliver Schweiger; William E Kunin
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Quantitative and qualitative assessment of pollen DNA metabarcoding using constructed species mixtures.

Authors:  Karen L Bell; Kevin S Burgess; Jamieson C Botsch; Emily K Dobbs; Timothy D Read; Berry J Brosi
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  A Comparison of Honey Bee-Collected Pollen From Working Agricultural Lands Using Light Microscopy and ITS Metabarcoding.

Authors:  M D Smart; R S Cornman; D D Iwanowicz; M McDermott-Kubeczko; J S Pettis; M S Spivak; C R V Otto
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.377

6.  Evaluating multiplexed next-generation sequencing as a method in palynology for mixed pollen samples.

Authors:  A Keller; N Danner; G Grimmer; M Ankenbrand; K von der Ohe; W von der Ohe; S Rost; S Härtel; I Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.081

7.  DNA barcoding the native flowering plants and conifers of Wales.

Authors:  Natasha de Vere; Tim C G Rich; Col R Ford; Sarah A Trinder; Charlotte Long; Chris W Moore; Danielle Satterthwaite; Helena Davies; Joel Allainguillaume; Sandra Ronca; Tatiana Tatarinova; Hannah Garbett; Kevin Walker; Mike J Wilkinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Application of ITS2 metabarcoding to determine the provenance of pollen collected by honey bees in an agroecosystem.

Authors:  Rodney T Richardson; Chia-Hua Lin; Douglas B Sponsler; Juan O Quijia; Karen Goodell; Reed M Johnson
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 1.936

9.  Using DNA metabarcoding to investigate honey bee foraging reveals limited flower use despite high floral availability.

Authors:  Natasha de Vere; Laura E Jones; Tegan Gilmore; Jake Moscrop; Abigail Lowe; Dan Smith; Matthew J Hegarty; Simon Creer; Col R Ford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management.

Authors:  Péter Batáry; Lynn V Dicks; David Kleijn; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 7.563

View more
  5 in total

1.  Geographical and Seasonal Analysis of the Honeybee Microbiome.

Authors:  Eduardo L Almeida; Celine Ribiere; Werner Frei; Denis Kenny; Mary F Coffey; Paul W O'Toole
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Moths complement bumblebee pollination of red clover: a case for day-and-night insect surveillance.

Authors:  Jamie Alison; Jake M Alexander; Nathan Diaz Zeugin; Yoko L Dupont; Evelin Iseli; Hjalte M R Mann; Toke T Høye
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.812

Review 3.  Environmental DNA analysis as an emerging non-destructive method for plant biodiversity monitoring: a review.

Authors:  Pritam Banerjee; Kathryn A Stewart; Gobinda Dey; Caterina M Antognazza; Raju Kumar Sharma; Jyoti Prakash Maity; Santanu Saha; Hideyuki Doi; Natasha de Vere; Michael W Y Chan; Pin-Yun Lin; Hung-Chun Chao; Chien-Yen Chen
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  Citizen science monitoring reveals links between honeybee health, pesticide exposure and seasonal availability of floral resources.

Authors:  Ben A Woodcock; Anna E Oliver; Lindsay K Newbold; H Soon Gweon; Daniel S Read; Ujala Sayed; Joanna Savage; Jim Bacon; Emily Upcott; Katherine Howell; Katharine Turvey; David B Roy; M Gloria Pereira; Darren Sleep; Arran Greenop; Richard F Pywell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Temporal Patterns of Honeybee Foraging in a Diverse Floral Landscape Revealed Using Pollen DNA Metabarcoding of Honey.

Authors:  Laura Jones; Abigail Lowe; Col R Ford; Lynda Christie; Simon Creer; Natasha de Vere
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.392

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.