Literature DB >> 25270225

Evaluating multiplexed next-generation sequencing as a method in palynology for mixed pollen samples.

A Keller1, N Danner, G Grimmer, M Ankenbrand, K von der Ohe, W von der Ohe, S Rost, S Härtel, I Steffan-Dewenter.   

Abstract

The identification of pollen plays an important role in ecology, palaeo-climatology, honey quality control and other areas. Currently, expert knowledge and reference collections are essential to identify pollen origin through light microscopy. Pollen identification through molecular sequencing and DNA barcoding has been proposed as an alternative approach, but the assessment of mixed pollen samples originating from multiple plant species is still a tedious and error-prone task. Next-generation sequencing has been proposed to avoid this hindrance. In this study we assessed mixed pollen probes through next-generation sequencing of amplicons from the highly variable, species-specific internal transcribed spacer 2 region of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Further, we developed a bioinformatic workflow to analyse these high-throughput data with a newly created reference database. To evaluate the feasibility, we compared results from classical identification based on light microscopy from the same samples with our sequencing results. We assessed in total 16 mixed pollen samples, 14 originated from honeybee colonies and two from solitary bee nests. The sequencing technique resulted in higher taxon richness (deeper assignments and more identified taxa) compared to light microscopy. Abundance estimations from sequencing data were significantly correlated with counted abundances through light microscopy. Simulation analyses of taxon specificity and sensitivity indicate that 96% of taxa present in the database are correctly identifiable at the genus level and 70% at the species level. Next-generation sequencing thus presents a useful and efficient workflow to identify pollen at the genus and species level without requiring specialised palynological expert knowledge.
© 2014 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA barcoding; ITS2; high throughput; internal transcribed spacer 2; meta-barcoding; molecular ecology; phylotyping; pollination, plant-pollinator interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25270225     DOI: 10.1111/plb.12251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)        ISSN: 1435-8603            Impact factor:   3.081


  49 in total

1.  Diverging landscape impacts on macronutrient status despite overlapping diets in managed (Apis mellifera) and native (Melissodes desponsa) bees.

Authors:  Christina L Mogren; María-Soledad Benítez; Kevin McCarter; Frédéric Boyer; Jonathan G Lundgren
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 2.  Poisonous or non-poisonous plants? DNA-based tools and applications for accurate identification.

Authors:  Valerio Mezzasalma; Ioannis Ganopoulos; Andrea Galimberti; Laura Cornara; Emanuele Ferri; Massimo Labra
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-10-30       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  DNA metabarcoding identifies urban foraging patterns of oligolectic and polylectic cavity-nesting bees.

Authors:  Kristen Fernandes; Kit Prendergast; Philip W Bateman; Benjamin J Saunders; Mark Gibberd; Michael Bunce; Paul Nevill
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Do amino and fatty acid profiles of pollen provisions correlate with bacterial microbiomes in the mason bee Osmia bicornis?

Authors:  Sara Diana Leonhardt; Birte Peters; Alexander Keller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Increased efficiency in identifying mixed pollen samples by meta-barcoding with a dual-indexing approach.

Authors:  Wiebke Sickel; Markus J Ankenbrand; Gudrun Grimmer; Andrea Holzschuh; Stephan Härtel; Jonathan Lanzen; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Alexander Keller
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.964

6.  Pollen DNA metabarcoding identifies regional provenance and high plant diversity in Australian honey.

Authors:  Liz Milla; Kale Sniderman; Rose Lines; Mahsa Mousavi-Derazmahalleh; Francisco Encinas-Viso
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Using DNA Metabarcoding to Identify the Floral Composition of Honey: A New Tool for Investigating Honey Bee Foraging Preferences.

Authors:  Jennifer Hawkins; Natasha de Vere; Adelaide Griffith; Col R Ford; Joel Allainguillaume; Matthew J Hegarty; Les Baillie; Beverley Adams-Groom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Taxonomic Characterization of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Pollen Foraging Based on Non-Overlapping Paired-End Sequencing of Nuclear Ribosomal Loci.

Authors:  R Scott Cornman; Clint R V Otto; Deborah Iwanowicz; Jeffery S Pettis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Using metabarcoding to reveal and quantify plant-pollinator interactions.

Authors:  André Pornon; Nathalie Escaravage; Monique Burrus; Hélène Holota; Aurélie Khimoun; Jérome Mariette; Charlène Pellizzari; Amaia Iribar; Roselyne Etienne; Pierre Taberlet; Marie Vidal; Peter Winterton; Lucie Zinger; Christophe Andalo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Rank-based characterization of pollen assemblages collected by honey bees using a multi-locus metabarcoding approach.

Authors:  Rodney T Richardson; Chia-Hua Lin; Juan O Quijia; Natalia S Riusech; Karen Goodell; Reed M Johnson
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 1.936

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.