Literature DB >> 28062536

A Comparison of Honey Bee-Collected Pollen From Working Agricultural Lands Using Light Microscopy and ITS Metabarcoding.

M D Smart1, R S Cornman2, D D Iwanowicz3, M McDermott-Kubeczko4, J S Pettis5, M S Spivak4, C R V Otto1.   

Abstract

Taxonomic identification of pollen has historically been accomplished via light microscopy but requires specialized knowledge and reference collections, particularly when identification to lower taxonomic levels is necessary. Recently, next-generation sequencing technology has been used as a cost-effective alternative for identifying bee-collected pollen; however, this novel approach has not been tested on a spatially or temporally robust number of pollen samples. Here, we compare pollen identification results derived from light microscopy and DNA sequencing techniques with samples collected from honey bee colonies embedded within a gradient of intensive agricultural landscapes in the Northern Great Plains throughout the 2010-2011 growing seasons. We demonstrate that at all taxonomic levels, DNA sequencing was able to discern a greater number of taxa, and was particularly useful for the identification of infrequently detected species. Importantly, substantial phenological overlap did occur for commonly detected taxa using either technique, suggesting that DNA sequencing is an appropriate, and enhancing, substitutive technique for accurately capturing the breadth of bee-collected species of pollen present across agricultural landscapes. We also show that honey bees located in high and low intensity agricultural settings forage on dissimilar plants, though with overlap of the most abundantly collected pollen taxa. We highlight practical applications of utilizing sequencing technology, including addressing ecological issues surrounding land use, climate change, importance of taxa relative to abundance, and evaluating the impact of conservation program habitat enhancement efforts. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America 2016. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agriculture; honey bee; land use; pollen identification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28062536     DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvw159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Entomol        ISSN: 0046-225X            Impact factor:   2.377


  18 in total

1.  Diverging landscape impacts on macronutrient status despite overlapping diets in managed (Apis mellifera) and native (Melissodes desponsa) bees.

Authors:  Christina L Mogren; María-Soledad Benítez; Kevin McCarter; Frédéric Boyer; Jonathan G Lundgren
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Honey bee (Apis mellifera) nurses do not consume pollens based on their nutritional quality.

Authors:  Vanessa Corby-Harris; Lucy Snyder; Charlotte Meador; Trace Ayotte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Flower preferences and pollen transport networks for cavity-nesting solitary bees: Implications for the design of agri-environment schemes.

Authors:  Catherine E A Gresty; Elizabeth Clare; Dion S Devey; Robyn S Cowan; Laszlo Csiba; Panagiota Malakasi; Owen T Lewis; Katherine J Willis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Honey bee colony performance and health are enhanced by apiary proximity to US Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands.

Authors:  Vincent A Ricigliano; Brendon M Mott; Patrick W Maes; Amy S Floyd; William Fitz; Duan C Copeland; William G Meikle; Kirk E Anderson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Seasonal variation of pollen collected by honey bees (Apis mellifera) in developed areas across four regions in the United States.

Authors:  Pierre Lau; Vaughn Bryant; James D Ellis; Zachary Y Huang; Joseph Sullivan; Daniel R Schmehl; Ana R Cabrera; Juliana Rangel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Native habitat mitigates feast-famine conditions faced by honey bees in an agricultural landscape.

Authors:  Adam G Dolezal; Ashley L St Clair; Ge Zhang; Amy L Toth; Matthew E O'Neal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Pollinator specialization increases with a decrease in a mass-flowering plant in networks inferred from DNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  André Pornon; Sandra Baksay; Nathalie Escaravage; Monique Burrus; Christophe Andalo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Pollen DNA metabarcoding identifies regional provenance and high plant diversity in Australian honey.

Authors:  Liz Milla; Kale Sniderman; Rose Lines; Mahsa Mousavi-Derazmahalleh; Francisco Encinas-Viso
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Do honey bee (Apis mellifera) foragers recruit their nestmates to native forbs in reconstructed prairie habitats?

Authors:  Morgan K Carr-Markell; Cora M Demler; Margaret J Couvillon; Roger Schürch; Marla Spivak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Molecular sequencing and morphological identification reveal similar patterns in native bee communities across public and private grasslands of eastern North Dakota.

Authors:  Brian Darby; Russ Bryant; Abby Keller; Madison Jochim; Josephine Moe; Zoe Schreiner; Carrie Pratt; Ned H Euliss; Mia Park; Rebecca Simmons; Clint Otto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.