Tomasz Pietrzykowski1, Katarzyna Smilowska2. 1. Research Centre for Public Policy and Regulatory Governance, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland. 2. Department of Neurology; Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. kasia.smilowska@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Informed consent is a basic concept of contemporary, autonomy-based medical practice and facilitates a shared decision-making model for relations between physicians and patients. Thus, the extent to which patients can comprehend the consent they grant is essential to the ethical viability of medicine as it is pursued today. However, research on patients' comprehension of an informed consent's basic components shows that their level of understanding is limited. METHODS: Systemic searches of the PubMed and Web of Science databases were performed to identify the literature on informed consent, specifically patients' comprehension of specific informed consent components. RESULTS: In total, 14 relevant articles were retrieved. In most studies, few clinical trial participants correctly responded to items that examined their awareness of what they consented to. Participants demonstrated the highest level of understanding (over 50%) regarding voluntary participation, blinding (excluding knowledge about investigators' blinding), and freedom to withdraw at any time. Only a small minority of patients demonstrated comprehension of placebo concepts, randomisation, safety issues, risks, and side effects. CONCLUSIONS: We found that participants' comprehension of fundamental informed consent components was low, which is worrisome because this lack of understanding undermines an ethical pillar of contemporary clinical trial practice and questions the viability of patients' full and genuine involvement in a shared medical decision-making process.
BACKGROUND: Informed consent is a basic concept of contemporary, autonomy-based medical practice and facilitates a shared decision-making model for relations between physicians and patients. Thus, the extent to which patients can comprehend the consent they grant is essential to the ethical viability of medicine as it is pursued today. However, research on patients' comprehension of an informed consent's basic components shows that their level of understanding is limited. METHODS: Systemic searches of the PubMed and Web of Science databases were performed to identify the literature on informed consent, specifically patients' comprehension of specific informed consent components. RESULTS: In total, 14 relevant articles were retrieved. In most studies, few clinical trial participants correctly responded to items that examined their awareness of what they consented to. Participants demonstrated the highest level of understanding (over 50%) regarding voluntary participation, blinding (excluding knowledge about investigators' blinding), and freedom to withdraw at any time. Only a small minority of patients demonstrated comprehension of placebo concepts, randomisation, safety issues, risks, and side effects. CONCLUSIONS: We found that participants' comprehension of fundamental informed consent components was low, which is worrisome because this lack of understanding undermines an ethical pillar of contemporary clinical trial practice and questions the viability of patients' full and genuine involvement in a shared medical decision-making process.
Entities:
Keywords:
Autonomy; Clinical trials; Comprehension; Ethics; Health care quality; Informed consent; Law; Medical practice
Authors: Ruth D Ellis; Issaka Sagara; Anna Durbin; Alassane Dicko; Donna Shaffer; Louis Miller; Mahamadoun H Assadou; Mamady Kone; Beh Kamate; Ousmane Guindo; Michael P Fay; Dapa A Diallo; Ogobara K Doumbo; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Joseph Millum Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-07-21
Authors: Lydia O'Sullivan; Tomás P Carroll; Niamh Clarke; Sarah Cooper; Ann Cullen; Laura Gorman; Billy McCann; Blánaid Mee; Nicola Miller; Verena Murphy; Máiréad Murray; Jackie O'Leary; Sharon O'Toole; Emma Snapes; Suzanne Bracken Journal: HRB Open Res Date: 2021-09-15
Authors: Katharine J Head; Jane A Hartsock; Tamilyn Bakas; Malaz A Boustani; Matthew Schroeder; Nicole R Fowler Journal: J Patient Exp Date: 2022-04-12