Literature DB >> 30059894

User testing as a method for evaluating subjects' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis.

Michela Ponzio1, Michele Messmer Uccelli2, Stefano Lionetti2, Dionisio Franco Barattini3, Giampaolo Brichetto4, Paola Zaratin2, Mario Alberto Battaglia5, Andrea Tacchino2.   

Abstract

The Patient Information Sheet (PIS) is an important aspect of the consent process in a clinical trial that provides potential participants the necessary information for deciding whether to take part in a specific study and for understanding their rights pertaining to participation. User Testing was originally developed to assess how written information about medicinal products performs with its intended users. User testing has been proposed in a small number of clinical trials and has been able to identify subjects' ability or inability to find and understand important information related to providing a valid consent to participate. A 21-item ad hoc user testing questionnaire was applied to 2 PIS used in clinical trials in MS. Sixty subjects were allocated to a group testing an observational study PIS (O-PIS) or to a group testing an intervention study PIS (I-PIS). In the O-PIS group, 19.4% of subjects located all relevant information within the text (21/21) and 3.4% of subjects in the I-PIS group. Overall, 82.1% of subjects testing the O-PIS understood the text and 53.5% of subjects testing the I-PIS understood the text. In the category 'nature and purpose of the trial', one-third of subjects did not understand the text, including the aim of the study. User testing should be considered as a valid tool in evaluating the comprehensibility of PIS in the context of clinical trials MS to assure that subjects provide a valid consent to participate.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comprehension; Multiple sclerosis; Patient information; Readability; User testing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30059894     DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.07.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord        ISSN: 2211-0348            Impact factor:   4.339


  3 in total

Review 1.  Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: why and how?

Authors:  Andrea Pace; Johan A F Koekkoek; Martin J van den Bent; Helen J Bulbeck; Jane Fleming; Robin Grant; Heidrun Golla; Roger Henriksson; Simon Kerrigan; Christine Marosi; Ingela Oberg; Stefan Oberndorfer; Kathy Oliver; H Roeline W Pasman; Emilie Le Rhun; Alasdair G Rooney; Roberta Rudà; Simone Veronese; Tobias Walbert; Michael Weller; Wolfgang Wick; Martin J B Taphoorn; Linda Dirven
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-07-16

Review 2.  The reality of informed consent: empirical studies on patient comprehension-systematic review.

Authors:  Tomasz Pietrzykowski; Katarzyna Smilowska
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  An enhanced participant information leaflet and multimedia intervention to improve the quality of informed consent to a randomised clinical trial enrolling people living with HIV and obesity: a protocol for a Study Within A Trial (SWAT).

Authors:  Lydia O'Sullivan; Stefano Savinelli; Stephen O'Hare; Sinéad Holden; Ciara McHugh; Patrick Mallon; Peter Doran
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.