Literature DB >> 33445634

Co-Benefits Analysis of Buildings Based on Different Renewal Strategies: The Emergy-Lca Approach.

Wenjing Cui1, Jingke Hong1, Guiwen Liu1, Kaijian Li1, Yuanyuan Huang1, Lin Zhang2.   

Abstract

Many cities have encountered challenges associated with rapid urban development, population growth and aging, in which urban renewal has become a promising option. Different renewal strategies, such as redevelopment, refurbishment and conservation, not only contributes to quality improvement and energy consumption reduction of dilapidated urban area, but also to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mitigation. Such integrated benefits are often termed as co-benefits. However, choosing the most co-benefits strategy to adopt requires a holistic understanding of social-economic and environmental aspects, which has been less reported in the existing literature. Under such circumstance, this article aims to shed light on the co-benefits of different renewal strategies by adopting the Emergy-Life cycle assessment method. Then, the method is applied to one case study of the refurbishment of an educational building located in Chongqing, China. Resource allocation, CO2 emissions and emergy-based indicators are calculated to assess the co-benefits during a 60-year research period, to compare the impacts of the complete demolition followed by a new one (rebuilding strategy) and the refurbishing of the existing building (refurbishment strategy). The case study shows that the annual emergy in the O&M phase of rebuilding strategy and refurbishment strategy were lower than existing building. Rebuilding and refurbishment strategies released approximately 59.1% and 80.6%, respectively, of the total CO2 emissions that would be produced by the existing building. The results reveal that substantial environmental benefits can be obtained in both the refurbishment and rebuilding strategies. On the other hand, it can be concluded that the emergy yield ratio (EYR) for the rebuilding strategy is higher than refurbishment strategy, which demonstrate the better performance of refurbishment considering that less resources are required to generate greater benefits. In addition, the value of environmental loading ratio (ELR) and emergy sustainability index (ESI) also suggests that the refurbishment strategy performs better from the perspective of the environment. Thereby, the refurbishment strategy is more suitable than the rebuilding strategy. Findings from this study can be useful to urban planners and decision-makers in choosing the most suitable strategy to improve the quality of existing buildings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  co-benefits; emergy analysis; life cycle assessment (lca); rebuilding strategy; refurbishment strategy; urban renewal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33445634      PMCID: PMC7827707          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  7 in total

1.  [Emergy evaluation of power plant eco-industrial park].

Authors:  Lingmei Wang; Jintun Zhang
Journal:  Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao       Date:  2004-06

2.  The built environment, climate change, and health: opportunities for co-benefits.

Authors:  Margalit Younger; Heather R Morrow-Almeida; Stephen M Vindigni; Andrew L Dannenberg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment within the built environment: Comparison between the refurbishment and the complete reconstruction of an office building in Belgium.

Authors:  Anne-Françoise Marique; Barbara Rossi
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 4.  Energy savings, emission reductions, and health co-benefits of the green building movement.

Authors:  MacNaughton P; Cao X; Buonocore J; Cedeno-Laurent J; Spengler J; Bernstein A; Allen J
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Evaluating natural experiments to measure the co-benefits of urban policy interventions to reduce carbon emissions in New Zealand.

Authors:  Philippa Howden-Chapman; Michael Keall; Kate Whitwell; Ralph Chapman
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Development of the Low Emissions Analysis Platform - Integrated Benefits Calculator (LEAP-IBC) tool to assess air quality and climate co-benefits: Application for Bangladesh.

Authors:  Johan C I Kuylenstierna; Charles G Heaps; Tanvir Ahmed; Harry W Vallack; W Kevin Hicks; Mike R Ashmore; Christopher S Malley; Guozhong Wang; Elsa N Lefèvre; Susan C Anenberg; Forrest Lacey; Drew T Shindell; Utpal Bhattacharjee; Daven K Henze
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 7.  Health Co-Benefits of Green Building Design Strategies and Community Resilience to Urban Flooding: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Adele Houghton; Carlos Castillo-Salgado
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.