Bertrand Debono1, Thomas W Wainwright2, Michael Y Wang3, Freyr G Sigmundsson4, Michael M H Yang5, Henriëtte Smid-Nanninga6, Aurélien Bonnal7, Jean-Charles Le Huec8, William J Fawcett9, Olle Ljungqvist10, Guillaume Lonjon11, Hans D de Boer12. 1. Paris-Versailles Spine Center (Centre Francilien du Dos), Paris, France; Ramsay Santé-Hôpital Privé de Versailles, Versailles, France. Electronic address: bdebono@gmail.com. 2. Research Institute, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK; The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, Bournemouth, UK. 3. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Södra Grev Rosengatan, Örebro, Sweden. 5. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Section of Neurosurgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 6. Scientific Institute, Martini General Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands. 7. Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique St-Jean- Sud de France, Santécité Group. St Jean de Vedas, Montpellier Metropole, France. 8. Department of Orthopedic Surgery - Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France. 9. Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK. 10. School of Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. 11. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthosud, Clinique St-Jean- Sud de France, SantéCité Group. St Jean de Vedas, Montpellier Metropole, France. 12. Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, Martini General Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) evidence-based protocols for perioperative care have led to improvements in outcomes in numerous surgical areas, through multimodal optimization of patient pathway, reduction of complications, improved patient experience and reduction in the length of stay. ERAS represent a relatively new paradigm in spine surgery. PURPOSE: This multidisciplinary consensus review summarizes the literature and proposes recommendations for the perioperative care of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery with an ERAS program. STUDY DESIGN: This is a review article. METHODS: Under the impetus of the ERAS® society, a multidisciplinary guideline development group was constituted by bringing together international experts involved in the practice of ERAS and spine surgery. This group identified 22 ERAS items for lumbar fusion. A systematic search in the English language was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and cohort studies were included, and the evidence was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Consensus recommendation was reached by the group after a critical appraisal of the literature. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-six articles were included to develop the consensus statements for 22 ERAS items; one ERAS item (prehabilitation) was excluded from the final summary due to very poor quality and conflicting evidence in lumbar spinal fusion. From these remaining 21 ERAS items, 28 recommendations were included. All recommendations on ERAS protocol items are based on the best available evidence. These included nine preoperative, eleven intraoperative, and six postoperative recommendations. They span topics from preoperative patient education and nutritional evaluation, intraoperative anesthetic and surgical techniques, and postoperative multimodal analgesic strategies. The level of evidence for the use of each recommendation is presented. CONCLUSION: Based on the best evidence available for each ERAS item within the multidisciplinary perioperative care pathways, the ERAS® Society presents this comprehensive consensus review for perioperative care in lumbar fusion.
BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) evidence-based protocols for perioperative care have led to improvements in outcomes in numerous surgical areas, through multimodal optimization of patient pathway, reduction of complications, improved patient experience and reduction in the length of stay. ERAS represent a relatively new paradigm in spine surgery. PURPOSE: This multidisciplinary consensus review summarizes the literature and proposes recommendations for the perioperative care of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery with an ERAS program. STUDY DESIGN: This is a review article. METHODS: Under the impetus of the ERAS® society, a multidisciplinary guideline development group was constituted by bringing together international experts involved in the practice of ERAS and spine surgery. This group identified 22 ERAS items for lumbar fusion. A systematic search in the English language was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and cohort studies were included, and the evidence was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Consensus recommendation was reached by the group after a critical appraisal of the literature. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-six articles were included to develop the consensus statements for 22 ERAS items; one ERAS item (prehabilitation) was excluded from the final summary due to very poor quality and conflicting evidence in lumbar spinal fusion. From these remaining 21 ERAS items, 28 recommendations were included. All recommendations on ERAS protocol items are based on the best available evidence. These included nine preoperative, eleven intraoperative, and six postoperative recommendations. They span topics from preoperative patient education and nutritional evaluation, intraoperative anesthetic and surgical techniques, and postoperative multimodal analgesic strategies. The level of evidence for the use of each recommendation is presented. CONCLUSION: Based on the best evidence available for each ERAS item within the multidisciplinary perioperative care pathways, the ERAS® Society presents this comprehensive consensus review for perioperative care in lumbar fusion.
Authors: Ehsan Jazini; Alexandra E Thomson; Andre D Sabet; Omar Sohail; Leah Y Carreon; Lindsay Orosz; Fenil R Bhatt; Rita Roy; Colin M Haines; Thomas C Schuler; Christopher R Good Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2021-11-06
Authors: Kevin Berardino; Austin H Carroll; Alicia Kaneb; Matthew D Civilette; William F Sherman; Alan D Kaye Journal: Orthop Rev (Pavia) Date: 2021-06-22
Authors: Basma Mohamed; Ramani Ramachandran; Ferenc Rabai; Catherine C Price; Adam Polifka; Daniel Hoh; Christoph N Seubert Journal: J Neurosurg Anesthesiol Date: 2021-08-05 Impact factor: 3.956