Cheng Li1, Yang Cheng2, Zhao Li1, Donara Margaryan1, Carsten Perka1, Andrej Trampuz1. 1. Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany. 2. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing 100035, China.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The programs of enhanced recovery after surgery are the new revolution in surgical departments; however, features of this concept have not been systematically explored. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)-related research using bibliometric analysis. Materials and Methods: The search strategy of ERAS programs was conducted in the Web of Science database. Bibliometric analysis was further performed by Excel and Bibliometrix software. The relationship between citation counts and Mendeley readers was assessed by linear regression analysis. Results: 8539 studies from 1994-2019 were included in the present research, with reporting studies originating from 91 countries using 18 languages. The United States (US) published the greatest number of articles. International cooperation was discovered in 82 countries, with the most cooperative country being the United Kingdom. Henrik Kehlet was found to have published the highest number of studies. The journal Anesthesia and Analgesia had the largest number of articles. Linear regression analysis presented a strong positive correlation between citations and Mendeley readers. Most research was related to gastrointestinal surgery in this field. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis shows the current status of ERAS programs from multiple perspectives, and it provides reference and guidance to scholars for further research.
Background and Objectives: The programs of enhanced recovery after surgery are the new revolution in surgical departments; however, features of this concept have not been systematically explored. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)-related research using bibliometric analysis. Materials and Methods: The search strategy of ERAS programs was conducted in the Web of Science database. Bibliometric analysis was further performed by Excel and Bibliometrix software. The relationship between citation counts and Mendeley readers was assessed by linear regression analysis. Results: 8539 studies from 1994-2019 were included in the present research, with reporting studies originating from 91 countries using 18 languages. The United States (US) published the greatest number of articles. International cooperation was discovered in 82 countries, with the most cooperative country being the United Kingdom. Henrik Kehlet was found to have published the highest number of studies. The journal Anesthesia and Analgesia had the largest number of articles. Linear regression analysis presented a strong positive correlation between citations and Mendeley readers. Most research was related to gastrointestinal surgery in this field. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis shows the current status of ERAS programs from multiple perspectives, and it provides reference and guidance to scholars for further research.
Authors: Bertrand Debono; Thomas W Wainwright; Michael Y Wang; Freyr G Sigmundsson; Michael M H Yang; Henriëtte Smid-Nanninga; Aurélien Bonnal; Jean-Charles Le Huec; William J Fawcett; Olle Ljungqvist; Guillaume Lonjon; Hans D de Boer Journal: Spine J Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; M Hubner; J Nygren; N Demartines; N Francis; T A Rockall; T M Young-Fadok; A G Hill; M Soop; H D de Boer; R D Urman; G J Chang; A Fichera; H Kessler; F Grass; E E Whang; W J Fawcett; F Carli; D N Lobo; K E Rollins; A Balfour; G Baldini; B Riedel; O Ljungqvist Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Ajay Aggarwal; Grant Lewison; Saliha Idir; Matthew Peters; Carolyn Aldige; Win Boerckel; Peter Boyle; Edward L Trimble; Philip Roe; Tariq Sethi; Jesme Fox; Richard Sullivan Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Mark T Yost; Joshua S Jolissaint; Adam C Fields; P Marco Fisichella Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 1.878
Authors: Gijs H K Berkelmans; Laura F C Fransen; Annemarie C P Dolmans-Zwartjes; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Marc J van Det; Magnus Nilsson; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Misha D P Luyer Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Malaika S Vlug; Jan Wind; Markus W Hollmann; Dirk T Ubbink; Huib A Cense; Alexander F Engel; Michael F Gerhards; Bart A van Wagensveld; Edwin S van der Zaag; Anna A W van Geloven; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Miguel A Cuesta; Willem A Bemelman Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: R M Engelman; J A Rousou; J E Flack; D W Deaton; C B Humphrey; L H Ellison; P D Allmendinger; S G Owen; P S Pekow Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Georgia Herbert; Rachel Perry; Henning Keinke Andersen; Charlotte Atkinson; Christopher Penfold; Stephen J Lewis; Andrew R Ness; Steven Thomas Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-07-22
Authors: Cheng Li; Andrew L Foster; Nicholas Hang Bao Han; Andrej Trampuz; Michael Schuetz Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 3.246
Authors: Maria Gómez; Cesar E Izquierdo; Victor Mayoral Rojals; Joseph Pergolizzi; Ricardo Plancarte Sanchez; Antonella Paladini; Giustino Varrassi Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-04-02