PURPOSE: Retrospective observational cohort study of primary adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery during the transitional period prior to and after the implementation of Enhanced Surgical Recovery (ESR) at a single center. We sought to determine if ESR reduces in-hospital and 90-day post-operative opioid consumption for ASD surgery. METHODS: We evaluated patients undergoing primary ASD surgery in the transition period prior to (N = 29) and after (N = 56) adoption of ESR, comparing in-hospital and 90-day post-operative opioid consumption. Regression analysis was used to control for confounders including age, number of surgical levels, surgical approach, staged vs same-day surgery, insurance type and pre-op opioid use. RESULTS: Mean age of the cohort was 53 years with 57 (60%) females. Regression analysis showed that pre-operative opioid use and number of levels fused were associated with higher in-hospital and 90-day post-operative opioid consumption, while use of ESR was associated with lower in-hospital and 90-day post-operative opioid consumption. Secondary analysis showed that patients on ESR ambulated earlier (0.6 days vs 1.1, p = 0.028) and had their urinary catheter removed earlier (2.7 days vs 3.9, p = 0.006) compared to non-ESR patients. CONCLUSIONS: ESR was associated with a significantly decreased in-hospital and 90-day post-operative opioid consumption and earlier mobilization with earlier urinary catheter removal in patients undergoing primary ASD surgery. These results demonstrate ESR's potential to improve outcomes in ASD perioperative care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
PURPOSE: Retrospective observational cohort study of primary adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery during the transitional period prior to and after the implementation of Enhanced Surgical Recovery (ESR) at a single center. We sought to determine if ESR reduces in-hospital and 90-day post-operative opioid consumption for ASD surgery. METHODS: We evaluated patients undergoing primary ASD surgery in the transition period prior to (N = 29) and after (N = 56) adoption of ESR, comparing in-hospital and 90-day post-operative opioid consumption. Regression analysis was used to control for confounders including age, number of surgical levels, surgical approach, staged vs same-day surgery, insurance type and pre-op opioid use. RESULTS: Mean age of the cohort was 53 years with 57 (60%) females. Regression analysis showed that pre-operative opioid use and number of levels fused were associated with higher in-hospital and 90-day post-operative opioid consumption, while use of ESR was associated with lower in-hospital and 90-day post-operative opioid consumption. Secondary analysis showed that patients on ESR ambulated earlier (0.6 days vs 1.1, p = 0.028) and had their urinary catheter removed earlier (2.7 days vs 3.9, p = 0.006) compared to non-ESR patients. CONCLUSIONS: ESR was associated with a significantly decreased in-hospital and 90-day post-operative opioid consumption and earlier mobilization with earlier urinary catheter removal in patients undergoing primary ASD surgery. These results demonstrate ESR's potential to improve outcomes in ASD perioperative care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Authors: K C H Fearon; O Ljungqvist; M Von Meyenfeldt; A Revhaug; C H C Dejong; K Lassen; J Nygren; J Hausel; M Soop; J Andersen; H Kehlet Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2005-04-21 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Ellen M Soffin; Douglas S Wetmore; Lauren A Barber; Avani S Vaishnav; James D Beckman; Todd J Albert; Catherine H Gang; Sheeraz A Qureshi Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Chad Gridley; Jennifer Robles; Joshua Calvert; Nicholas Kavoussi; Taylor Winkler; Jennifer Jayaram; Matthew Fosnot; Justin Liberman; Brian Allen; Matthew McEvoy; Duke Herrell; Ryan Hsi; Nicole L Miller Journal: J Endourol Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Bhavishya S Clark; Mark Swanson; William Widjaja; Brian Cameron; Valerie Yu; Ksenia Ershova; Franklin M Wu; Erik B Vanstrum; Ruben Ulloa; Andrew Heng; Margaret Nurimba; Niels Kokot; Amit Kochhar; Uttam K Sinha; M P Kim; Shane Dickerson Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Bhiken I Naik; Edward C Nemergut; Ali Kazemi; Lucas Fernández; Sarah K Cederholm; Timothy L McMurry; Marcel E Durieux Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Larissa A Meyer; Javier Lasala; Maria D Iniesta; Alpa M Nick; Mark F Munsell; Qiuling Shi; Xin Shelley Wang; Katherine E Cain; Karen H Lu; Pedro T Ramirez Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Gregory T Kennedy; Christine M Hill; Ye Huang; Alycia So; Joshua Fosnot; Liza Wu; John T Farrar; Julia Tchou Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2019-10-12 Impact factor: 2.565