Literature DB >> 33442468

Justification for species selection for pharmaceutical toxicity studies.

Helen Prior1, Richard Haworth2, Briony Labram1, Ruth Roberts3, Alison Wolfreys4, Fiona Sewell1.   

Abstract

Toxicity studies using mammalian species are generally required to provide safety data to support clinical development and licencing registration for potential new pharmaceuticals. International regulatory guidelines outline recommendations for the order (rodent and/or non-rodent) and number of species, retaining flexibility for development of a diverse range of drug modalities in a manner relevant for each specific new medicine. Selection of the appropriate toxicology species involves consideration of scientific, ethical and practical factors, with individual companies likely having different perspectives and preferences regarding weighting of various aspects dependent upon molecule characteristics and previous experience of specific targets or molecule classes. This article summarizes presentations from a symposium at the 2019 Annual Congress of the British Toxicology Society on the topic of species selection for pharmaceutical toxicity studies. This symposium included an overview of results from a National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) and Association of British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) international collaboration that reviewed the use of one or two species in regulatory toxicology studies and justification for the species selected within each programme. Perspectives from two pharmaceutical companies described their processes for species selection for evaluation of biologics, and justification for selection of the minipig as a toxicological species for small molecules. This article summarizes discussions on the scientific justification and other considerations taken into account to ensure the most appropriate animal species are used for toxicity studies to meet regulatory requirements and to provide the most value for informing project decisions.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3Rs; dog; drug development; minipig; non-rodent; rat; rodent; safety assessment; toxicology

Year:  2020        PMID: 33442468      PMCID: PMC7786171          DOI: 10.1093/toxres/tfaa081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)        ISSN: 2045-452X            Impact factor:   3.524


  35 in total

1.  The Use of Minipig in Drug Discovery and Development: Pros and Cons of Minipig Selection and Strategies to Use as a Preferred Nonrodent Species.

Authors:  Peter Heining; Tristan Ruysschaert
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 1.902

2.  Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412.

Authors:  Ganesh Suntharalingam; Meghan R Perry; Stephen Ward; Stephen J Brett; Andrew Castello-Cortes; Michael D Brunner; Nicki Panoskaltsis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Safety evaluation to support First-In-Man investigations II: toxicology studies.

Authors:  Paul Baldrick
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 4.  The utility of the minipig as an animal model in regulatory toxicology.

Authors:  Gerd Bode; Peter Clausing; Frederic Gervais; Jeanet Loegsted; Jörg Luft; Vicente Nogues; Jennifer Sims
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 5.  Optimized nonclinical safety assessment strategies supporting clinical development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies targeting inflammatory diseases.

Authors:  Frank R Brennan; Annick Cauvin; Jay Tibbitts; Alison Wolfreys
Journal:  Drug Dev Res       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.360

6.  Opportunities for use of one species for longer-term toxicology testing during drug development: A cross-industry evaluation.

Authors:  Helen Prior; Paul Baldrick; Sonja Beken; Helen Booler; Nancy Bower; Paul Brooker; Paul Brown; Brian Burlinson; Leigh Ann Burns-Naas; Warren Casey; Melissa Chapman; David Clarke; Lolke de Haan; Olaf Doehr; Noel Downes; Meghan Flaherty; Nichola Gellatly; Sophia Gry Moesgaard; Jennifer Harris; Mark Holbrook; Julia Hui; David Jones; Keith Jones; Hilla Kedar; Andreas Mahl; Alli Manninen; Aidan McGuire; Elisabeth Mortimer-Cassen; Marjorie Peraza; Michael K Pugsley; Jacques Richard; Ruth Roberts; Wendy Roosen; Andreas Rothfuss; Ankie Schoenmakers; Fiona Sewell; Richard Weaver; Lucinda Weir; Alison Wolfreys; Ian Kimber
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Current nonclinical testing paradigm enables safe entry to First-In-Human clinical trials: The IQ consortium nonclinical to clinical translational database.

Authors:  Thomas M Monticello; Thomas W Jones; Donna M Dambach; David M Potter; Michael W Bolt; Maggie Liu; Douglas A Keller; Timothy K Hart; Vivek J Kadambi
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Study of histamine release induced by acute administration of antitumor agents in dogs.

Authors:  A Eschalier; J Lavarenne; C Burtin; M Renoux; E Chapuy; M Rodriguez
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Is Science the Only Driver in Species Selection? An Internal Study to Evaluate Compound Requirements in the Minipig Compared to the Dog in Preclinical Studies.

Authors:  Kai Schaefer; Susanne Rensing; Heinz Hillen; John E Burkhardt; Paul-Georg Germann
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 1.902

10.  The Binding of Human IgG to Minipig FcγRs - Implications for Preclinical Assessment of Therapeutic Antibodies.

Authors:  Jerome Egli; Tilman Schlothauer; Christian Spick; Stefan Seeber; Thomas Singer; Alex Odermatt; Antonio Iglesias
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Common and Not-So-Common Pathologic Findings of the Gastrointestinal Tract of Rhesus and Cynomolgus Macaques.

Authors:  Amanda L Johnson; Rebekah I Keesler; Anne D Lewis; J Rachel Reader; Steven T Laing
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 1.930

2.  A survey on the use of mice, pigs, dogs and monkeys as animal models in biomedical research in Spain.

Authors:  Olatz Goñi-Balentziaga; Iván Ortega-Saez; Sergi Vila; Garikoitz Azkona
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  A preclinical platform for assessing antitumor effects and systemic toxicities of cancer drug targets.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Chun-Hao Huang; Francisco J Sánchez-Rivera; Margaret C Kennedy; Darjus F Tschaharganeh; John P Morris; Antonella Montinaro; Kevin P O'Rourke; Ana Banito; John E Wilkinson; Chi-Chao Chen; Yu-Jui Ho; Lukas E Dow; Sha Tian; Wei Luan; Elisa de Stanchina; Tinghu Zhang; Nathanael S Gray; Henning Walczak; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Exploring the Definition of "Similar Toxicities": Case Studies Illustrating Industry and Regulatory Interpretation of ICH S6(R1) for Long-Term Toxicity Studies in One or Two Species.

Authors:  Helen Prior; David O Clarke; David Jones; Eleni Salicru; Melissa M Schutten; Fiona Sewell
Journal:  Int J Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.380

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.