Literature DB >> 26674804

The Use of Minipig in Drug Discovery and Development: Pros and Cons of Minipig Selection and Strategies to Use as a Preferred Nonrodent Species.

Peter Heining1, Tristan Ruysschaert2.   

Abstract

The pig was introduced more than 20 years ago in drug development following attempts of finding a species that shares better homology with human than the dog, based on biophysiological parameters. However, miniaturization, standardized breeding, and health status control were required before the pig could find a broader than niche application in pharmaceutical industry. During the years of experience with minipigs in pharmaceutical research and the science evolving rapidly, the selection of a nonrodent animal species for preclinical safety testing became primarily driven by pharmacological (target expression homologous function), pharmacokinetic, and biophysiological considerations. This offered a broad field of application for the minipig, besides the well-established use in dermal projects in all areas of drug development but also in novel approaches including genetically modified animals. In this article, we look at recent approaches and requirements in the optimal selection of a nonrodent model in pharmaceutical development and critically ask how good a choice the minipig offers for the scientist, how did the testing environment evolve, and what are the key requirements for a broader use of the minipig compared to the other well-established nonrodent species like dog or monkey.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3R; drug development; minipig; nonrodent species; pharmaceuticals; toxicology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26674804     DOI: 10.1177/0192623315610823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  4 in total

Review 1.  The Neonatal and Juvenile Pig in Pediatric Drug Discovery and Development.

Authors:  Miriam Ayuso; Laura Buyssens; Marina Stroe; Allan Valenzuela; Karel Allegaert; Anne Smits; Pieter Annaert; Antonius Mulder; Sebastien Carpentier; Chris Van Ginneken; Steven Van Cruchten
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.321

2.  Justification for species selection for pharmaceutical toxicity studies.

Authors:  Helen Prior; Richard Haworth; Briony Labram; Ruth Roberts; Alison Wolfreys; Fiona Sewell
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Characterization of the immune system of Ellegaard Göttingen Minipigs - An important large animal model in experimental medicine.

Authors:  Clara P S Pernold; Emil Lagumdzic; Maria Stadler; Kerstin H Mair; Sven Jäckel; Michael W Schmitt; Andrea Ladinig; Christian Knecht; Sophie Dürlinger; Heinrich Kreutzmann; Vera Martin; Spencer Sawyer; Armin Saalmüller
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 8.786

4.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking in pigs: a reproducibility and sample size calculation study.

Authors:  A Faragli; R Tanacli; C Kolp; T Lapinskas; C Stehning; B Schnackenburg; F P Lo Muzio; S Perna; B Pieske; E Nagel; H Post; S Kelle; A Alogna
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.357

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.