Literature DB >> 32126256

Opportunities for use of one species for longer-term toxicology testing during drug development: A cross-industry evaluation.

Helen Prior1, Paul Baldrick2, Sonja Beken3, Helen Booler4, Nancy Bower5, Paul Brooker6, Paul Brown7, Brian Burlinson8, Leigh Ann Burns-Naas9, Warren Casey10, Melissa Chapman11, David Clarke12, Lolke de Haan13, Olaf Doehr14, Noel Downes15, Meghan Flaherty16, Nichola Gellatly17, Sophia Gry Moesgaard18, Jennifer Harris19, Mark Holbrook20, Julia Hui21, David Jones22, Keith Jones23, Hilla Kedar24, Andreas Mahl25, Alli Manninen26, Aidan McGuire27, Elisabeth Mortimer-Cassen28, Marjorie Peraza29, Michael K Pugsley30, Jacques Richard31, Ruth Roberts32, Wendy Roosen33, Andreas Rothfuss34, Ankie Schoenmakers35, Fiona Sewell17, Richard Weaver36, Lucinda Weir37, Alison Wolfreys38, Ian Kimber39.   

Abstract

An international expert working group representing 37 organisations (pharmaceutical/biotechnology companies, contract research organisations, academic institutions and regulatory bodies) collaborated in a data sharing exercise to evaluate the utility of two species within regulatory general toxicology studies. Anonymised data on 172 drug candidates (92 small molecules, 46 monoclonal antibodies, 15 recombinant proteins, 13 synthetic peptides and 6 antibody-drug conjugates) were submitted by 18 organisations. The use of one or two species across molecule types, the frequency for reduction to a single species within the package of general toxicology studies, and a comparison of target organ toxicities identified in each species in both short and longer-term studies were determined. Reduction to a single species for longer-term toxicity studies, as used for the development of biologicals (ICHS6(R1) guideline) was only applied for 8/133 drug candidates, but might have been possible for more, regardless of drug modality, as similar target organ toxicity profiles were identified in the short-term studies. However, definition and harmonisation around the criteria for similarity of toxicity profiles is needed to enable wider consideration of these principles. Analysis of a more robust dataset would be required to provide clear, evidence-based recommendations for expansion of these principles to small molecules or other modalities where two species toxicity testing is currently recommended.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3Rs; Biologics; Drug development; ICHS6(R1); Non-rodent; Nonclinical; Rodent; Small molecules; Species selection; Toxicology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32126256     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  3 in total

1.  Justification for species selection for pharmaceutical toxicity studies.

Authors:  Helen Prior; Richard Haworth; Briony Labram; Ruth Roberts; Alison Wolfreys; Fiona Sewell
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Exploring the Definition of "Similar Toxicities": Case Studies Illustrating Industry and Regulatory Interpretation of ICH S6(R1) for Long-Term Toxicity Studies in One or Two Species.

Authors:  Helen Prior; David O Clarke; David Jones; Eleni Salicru; Melissa M Schutten; Fiona Sewell
Journal:  Int J Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Assessment of Polyethylene Glycol-Coated Gold Nanoparticle Toxicity and Inflammation In Vivo Using NF-κB Reporter Mice.

Authors:  Tzu-Yin Chen; Mei-Ru Chen; Shan-Wen Liu; Jin-Yan Lin; Ya-Ting Yang; Hsin-Ying Huang; Jen-Kun Chen; Chung-Shi Yang; Kurt Ming-Chao Lin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.