| Literature DB >> 33442168 |
Arjun Baidya1, Santosh Kumar Singh2, Sarita Bajaj3, Abdul Hamid Zargar4, Parminder Singh5, Sambit Das6, Anand Shankar7.
Abstract
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Corona Virus; diabetes mellitus
Year: 2020 PMID: 33442168 PMCID: PMC7784172 DOI: 10.15605/jafes.035.01.06
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc ISSN: 0857-1074
Comparison of Characteristics of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)*
| Characteristics | Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome | Middle East Respiratory Syndrome | Coronavirus Disease-2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| First patients reported | Guangdong, China, November 2002 | Zarga, Jordan, April 2012 and Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, June 2012 | Wuhan, China, December 2019 |
| Virus | SARS-CoV | MERS-CoV | SARS-CoV-2 |
| Type of coronavirus | betacoronavirus | betacoronavirus | betacoronavirus |
| Host cell receptor | Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 | Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 | structural analysis suggests Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 receptor |
| Incubation period | |||
| Mean (95% CI: days) | 4.6 (3.8-5.8) | 5.2 (1.9-14.7) | 5.2 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1 to 7.0); 95th percentile of the distribution was 12.5 days |
| Range (days) | 2-14 | 2-13 | 2-14 |
| Time from illness onset until hospitalization | 2-8 days | 0-16 days | 12.5 days (mean)(95% CI, 10.3 to 14.8) - onset before January 1 9.1 days (mean); 95% CI, 8.6 to 9.7 January 1-11 |
| Patient characteristics | |||
| Adults | 93% | 98% | Nearly all reported patients are adults |
| Haematological abnormalities | |||
| Leukopenia | 25-35% | 14% | 9-25% |
| Lymphopenia | 65-85% | 32% | 35-70% |
| Thrombocytopenia | 40-45% | 36% | 5-12% |
| Mortality | |||
| Mortality Rate | 9.6% | 34.4% | 2.3 % |
Modified from Rasmussen et al.,[11] Wan Y et al.,[12] Li Q. et al.,[13] Lu R et al.,[14] Shen KL et al.[15]
Figure 1The life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in host cells.
Figure 2The mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) against COVID-19.
Medications which have been used in various small clinical trials but are still not validated by any RCT’s.*
| Drugs | Types | Mechanism of Action | Past Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroquine | 4-aminoquinoline | Not clearly known, changes the pH of endosomes and believed to prevent viral entry, transport and post-entry events. | Inhibits infection of cells by SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, approved for malaria treatment and prophylaxis. |
| Hydroxychloroquine | 4-aminoquinoline | Not clearly known, changes the pH of endosomes and believed to prevent viral entry, transport and post-entry events. | Inhibits infection of cells by SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, approved for malaria treatment and prophylaxis and autoimmune disease (e.g. rheumatic diseases). Approved for treatment of T2DM in India. |
| Azithromycin | Macrolide Antibacterial | Immunomodulatory mechanisms may include reducing chemotaxis of neutrophils (PMNs) to the lungs by inhibiting cytokines (i.e., IL-8), inhibition of mucus hypersecretion, decreased production of reactive oxygen species, accelerating neutrophil apoptosis, and blocking the activation of nuclear transcription factors. | Used in some protocols based on theoretical mechanism and limited preliminary data as adjunct therapy |
| Remdesivir | Adenosine nucleotide analogues | Inhibits viral application | Effective against SARS and MERS. Several large clinical trials are underway. |
| Ribavirin | Nucleoside analogue | Inhibits viral replication | Mixed result against MERS |
| Ribavirin plus Interferon | Nucleoside analogue | Inhibits viral replication | Mixed result against MERS |
| Tocilizumab | Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Receptor-Inhibiting Monoclonal Antibody | inhibits IL-6-mediated signaling by competitively binding to both soluble and membrane-bound IL-6 receptors. | Preliminary data suggest tocilizumab may have clinical benefit as adjunctive therapy. |
| Lopinavir/Ritonavir | Protease inhibitors | Blocks viral cell entry | Effective against SARS-CoV-1 both in vitro and human studies, approved for HIV-1 treatment. Preclinical data suggested potential benefit; however, more recent data has failed to confirm. |
Smith T et al.[80]