Literature DB >> 33441920

Aircraft events correspond with vocal behavior in a passerine.

Allison S Injaian1,2,3, Ethan D Lane4, Holger Klinck5.   

Abstract

Airports can affect birds by hindering acoustic communication. Here, we investigated the impacts of aircraft events on vocal behavior in wood thrush (Hylocichla mustelina) breeding one mile from an airport in Ithaca, NY, USA. We identified the number of wood thrush songs between 0500 and 0800 h at various distances from the airport and on days with various morning flight schedules. We also analyzed the number of sites from which birds sang during the peak of aircraft events (proxy of number of wood thrush). We found that birds sang more from 0600 to 0640 h when there were aircraft events during this period. This increased vocal behavior is likely explained by increased song output per individual wood thrush, rather than more wood thrush vocalizing. Increased song rate may negatively affect wood thrush fitness through increased energetic demands and/or time tradeoffs with other important behaviors, such as foraging. Identifying the noise thresholds associated with fitness costs (if any) and how different behavioral strategies (i.e. changing the pattern of vocalizations) may allow individuals to evade these costs would be useful for establishing conservation policy in breeding habitats used by passerines, such as the wood thrush.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33441920      PMCID: PMC7806583          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80380-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  25 in total

1.  Ecology: Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Margriet Peet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Energetic cost of calling: general constraints and species-specific differences.

Authors:  A G Ophir; S B Schrader; J F Gillooly
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Noise pollution is pervasive in U.S. protected areas.

Authors:  Rachel T Buxton; Megan F McKenna; Daniel Mennitt; Kurt Fristrup; Kevin Crooks; Lisa Angeloni; George Wittemyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  European seabass respond more strongly to noise exposure at night and habituate over repeated trials of sound exposure.

Authors:  Y Y Neo; J Hubert; L J Bolle; H V Winter; H Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Experimentally increased noise levels change spatial and singing behaviour.

Authors:  Kirsty Elizabeth McLaughlin; Hansjoerg P Kunc
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 6.  A review of the effects of aircraft noise on wildlife and humans, current control mechanisms, and the need for further study.

Authors:  Christopher B Pepper; Marc A Nascarella; Ronald J Kendall
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Blue whales respond to anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  Mariana L Melcón; Amanda J Cummins; Sara M Kerosky; Lauren K Roche; Sean M Wiggins; John A Hildebrand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Airport noise predicts song timing of European birds.

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Stefan Greif; Erwin Nemeth; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  The metabolic cost of birdsong production.

Authors:  K Oberweger; F Goller
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Aircraft sound exposure leads to song frequency decline and elevated aggression in wild chiffchaffs.

Authors:  Andrew D Wolfenden; Hans Slabbekoorn; Karolina Kluk; Selvino R de Kort
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.