Literature DB >> 20456573

Energetic cost of calling: general constraints and species-specific differences.

A G Ophir1, S B Schrader, J F Gillooly.   

Abstract

The energetic cost of acoustic signalling varies tremendously among species. Understanding factors responsible for this heterogeneity is important for understanding the costs and benefits of signalling. Here, we present a general model, based on well-established principles of bioenergetics, which predicts the energetic cost of call production across species. We test model predictions using an extensive database of resting and calling metabolic rates of insects, amphibians and birds. Results are largely supportive of model predictions. Calling metabolic rates scale predictably with body mass and temperature such that calling and resting metabolic rates are directly proportional to each other. The cost of acoustic signalling is approximately 8 times higher than resting metabolic rate in ectotherms, and approximately 2 times higher in birds. Differences in the increase in metabolic rate during calling are explained by the relative size of species' sound-producing muscles. Combined with published work, we quantify call efficiency and discuss model implications.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20456573     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02005.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  17 in total

Review 1.  Oxidative stress and condition-dependent sexual signals: more than just seeing red.

Authors:  Michael Garratt; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Is sociality required for the evolution of communicative complexity? Evidence weighed against alternative hypotheses in diverse taxonomic groups.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Joan Garcia-Porta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Intraspecific scaling in frog calls: the interplay of temperature, body size and metabolic condition.

Authors:  Lucia Ziegler; Matías Arim; Francisco Bozinovic
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The paradox of hearing at the lek: auditory sensitivity increases after breeding in female gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Authors:  Alexander T Baugh; Mark A Bee; Megan D Gall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  The origins and diversity of bat songs.

Authors:  Michael Smotherman; Mirjam Knörnschild; Grace Smarsh; Kirsten Bohn
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Immune-challenged vampire bats produce fewer contact calls.

Authors:  Sebastian Stockmaier; Daniel I Bolnick; Rachel A Page; Darija Josic; Gerald G Carter
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Comparative physiology of vocal musculature in two odontocetes, the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena).

Authors:  Nicole M Thometz; Jennifer L Dearolf; Robin C Dunkin; Dawn P Noren; Marla M Holt; Olivia C Sims; Brandon C Cathey; Terrie M Williams
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.200

8.  Cranking up the heat: relationships between energetically costly song features and the increase in thorax temperature in male crickets and katydids.

Authors:  Bettina Erregger; Helmut Kovac; Anton Stabentheiner; Manfred Hartbauer; Heinrich Römer; Arne K D Schmidt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Neural transcriptome reveals molecular mechanisms for temporal control of vocalization across multiple timescales.

Authors:  Ni Y Feng; Daniel J Fergus; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Metabolic costs of bat echolocation in a non-foraging context support a role in communication.

Authors:  Dina K N Dechmann; Martin Wikelski; Hendrika J van Noordwijk; Christian C Voigt; Silke L Voigt-Heucke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.