Literature DB >> 22911349

Costs and effectiveness of neonatal male circumcision.

Seema Kacker1, Kevin D Frick, Charlotte A Gaydos, Aaron A R Tobian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the expected change in the prevalence of male circumcision (MC)-reduced infections and resulting health care costs associated with continued decreases in MC rates. During the past 20 years, MC rates have declined from 79% to 55%, alongside reduced insurance coverage.
DESIGN: We used Markov-based Monte Carlo simulations to track men and women throughout their lifetimes as they experienced MC procedure-related events and MC-reduced infections and accumulated associated costs. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the impact of uncertainty.
SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: Birth cohort of men and women. INTERVENTION: Decreased MC rates (10% reflects the MC rate in Europe, where insurance coverage is limited). OUTCOMES MEASURED: Lifetime direct medical cost (2011 US$) and prevalence of MC-reduced infections.
RESULTS: Reducing the MC rate to 10% will increase lifetime health care costs by $407 per male and $43 per female. Net expenditure per annual birth cohort (including procedure and complication costs) is expected to increase by $505 million, reflecting an increase of $313 per forgone MC. Over 10 annual cohorts, net present value of additional costs would exceed $4.4 billion. Lifetime prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection among males is expected to increase by 12.2% (4843 cases), high- and low-risk human papillomavirus by 29.1% (57 124 cases), herpes simplex virus type 2 by 19.8% (124 767 cases), and infant urinary tract infections by 211.8% (26 876 cases). Among females, lifetime prevalence of bacterial vaginosis is expected to increase by 51.2% (538 865 cases), trichomoniasis by 51.2% (64 585 cases), high-risk human papillomavirus by 18.3% (33 148 cases), and low-risk human papillomavirus by 12.9% (25 837 cases). Increased prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection among males represents 78.9% of increased expenses.
CONCLUSION: Continued decreases in MC rates are associated with increased infection prevalence, thereby increasing medical expenditures for men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22911349      PMCID: PMC3640353          DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  64 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal circumcision: a review of the world's oldest and most controversial operation.

Authors:  Mark C Alanis; Richard S Lucidi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 2.  A brief review of the estimated economic burden of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: inflation-adjusted updates of previously published cost studies.

Authors:  Harrell W Chesson; Thomas L Gift; Kwame Owusu-Edusei; Guoyu Tao; Ana P Johnson; Charlotte K Kent
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine.

Authors:  M Gold
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants.

Authors:  T E Wiswell; F R Smith; J W Bass
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Trichomonas vaginalis genital infections: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Laura H Bachmann; Marcia M Hobbs; Arlene C Seña; Jack D Sobel; Jane R Schwebke; John N Krieger; R Scott McClelland; Kimberly A Workowski
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  The medical benefits of male circumcision.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; Ronald H Gray
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies.

Authors:  D Singh-Grewal; J Macdessi; J Craig
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 8.  The economic burden of noncervical human papillomavirus disease in the United States.

Authors:  Delphine Hu; Sue Goldie
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Male circumcision and human papillomavirus infection in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha Larke; Sara L Thomas; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Helen A Weiss
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  The safety of adult male circumcision in HIV-infected and uninfected men in Rakai, Uganda.

Authors:  Godfrey Kigozi; Ronald H Gray; Maria J Wawer; David Serwadda; Frederick Makumbi; Stephen Watya; Fred Nalugoda; Noah Kiwanuka; Lawrence H Moulton; Michael Z Chen; Nelson K Sewankambo; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Melanie C Bacon; Renee Ridzon; Pius Opendi; Victor Sempijja; Absolom Settuba; Denis Buwembo; Valerian Kiggundu; Margaret Anyokorit; James Nkale; Nehemia Kighoma; Blake Charvat
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  17 in total

1.  Doctors back circumcision.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Male circumcision: a globally relevant but under-utilized method for the prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; Seema Kacker; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 3.  Neonatal circumcision: new recommendations & implications for practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Simpson; Jean Carstensen; Patrick Murphy
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun

4.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Should male circumcision be advocated for genital cancer prevention?

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Adrian Mindel; Aaron Ar Tobian; Catherine A Hankins; Ronald H Gray; Robert C Bailey; Xavier Bosch; Alex D Wodak
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2012

6.  Sexually transmitted infections and male circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert S Van Howe
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2013-04-16

7.  Male circumcision: integrating tradition and medical evidence.

Authors:  Seema Kacker; Aaron A R Tobian
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.892

Review 8.  Voluntary medical male circumcision in resource-constrained settings.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; Tigistu Adamu; Jason B Reed; Valerian Kiggundu; Youseph Yazdi; Emmanuel Njeuhmeli
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Decline in Frequency of Newborn Male Circumcision After Change in Medicaid Coverage Status in Selected States in the United States.

Authors:  Taron Torosian; Joshua J Quint; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  The cost of Medicaid savings: the potential detrimental public health impact of neonatal circumcision defunding.

Authors:  Annie L Andrews; Gweneth B Lazenby; Elizabeth Ramsey Unal; Kit N Simpson
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.