Literature DB >> 3343994

Central motor conduction times using transcranial stimulation and F wave latencies.

L R Robinson1, P Jantra, I C MacLean.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine central motor conduction times between the motor cortex and the C8 spinal cord level (MC/C8), the motor cortex and S1 cord level (MC/S1), and C8 and S1 (C8/S1). We stimulated 29 normal subjects with a transcranial high voltage (300-500 V), short duration spike waveform (time constant 50 mu sec) and recorded over the hypothenar or calf muscles. F wave and M response latencies were used to estimate peripheral conduction time. The mean MC/C8 conduction time was 4.4 +/- 0.6 msec. Out of 26 subjects tested, 14 had discernable responses in the calf. The mean MC/S1 conduction time was 13.1 +/- 2.5 msec, and the mean estimated C8/S1 conduction time was 8.5 +/- 2.3 msec. This technique accurately measures conduction time from the motor cortex to the cervical anterior horn cells but is less reliable for monitoring conduction to the sacral cord. These values will facilitate future studies in patients with suspected lesions of the descending motor pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3343994     DOI: 10.1002/mus.880110214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  9 in total

1.  Central motor conduction after magnetic stimulation in diabetes.

Authors:  A Moglia; A Arrigo; M Maurelli; E Alfonsi; A Bodini; A Lozza; M T Tenconi; S B Solerte; E Ferrari
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-02

2.  High-voltage stimulation over the human spinal cord: sources of latency variation.

Authors:  B L Plassman; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Corticomuscular Coherence: a Novel Tool to Assess the Pyramidal Tract Dysfunction in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2.

Authors:  Luis Velázquez-Pérez; Johannes Tünnerhoff; Roberto Rodríguez-Labrada; Reidenis Torres-Vega; Paolo Belardinelli; Jacqueline Medrano-Montero; Arnoy Peña-Acosta; Nalia Canales-Ochoa; Yaimeé Vázquez-Mojena; Yanetza González-Zaldivar; Georg Auburger; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Reciprocal inhibition following lesions of the spinal cord in man.

Authors:  P Ashby; M Wiens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Motor evoked potentials in the post-surgical follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  M De Mattei; B Paschero; D Cocito; D Cassano; A Campanella; L Rizzo; E Morgando
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1995-05

6.  Prognostic value of intraoperative MEP signal improvement during surgical treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Ye Tian; Chu Wang; Xin Lu; Qianyu Zhuang; Huiming Peng; Jianhua Hu; Yu Zhao; Jianxiong Shen; Xisheng Weng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Targeted next generation sequencing in SPAST-negative hereditary spastic paraplegia.

Authors:  Kishore R Kumar; Nicholas F Blair; Himesha Vandebona; Christina Liang; Karl Ng; David M Sharpe; Anne Grünewald; Uta Gölnitz; Viatcheslav Saviouk; Arndt Rolfs; Christine Klein; Carolyn M Sue
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Posteroanterior Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation: Interactions with Cortical and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Jaclyn R Wecht; William M Savage; Grace O Famodimu; Gregory A Mendez; Jonah M Levine; Matthew T Maher; Joseph P Weir; Jill M Wecht; Jason B Carmel; Yu-Kuang Wu; Noam Y Harel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Apraxia and motor dysfunction in corticobasal syndrome.

Authors:  James R Burrell; Michael Hornberger; Steve Vucic; Matthew C Kiernan; John R Hodges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.