Literature DB >> 7591676

Motor evoked potentials in the post-surgical follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

M De Mattei1, B Paschero, D Cocito, D Cassano, A Campanella, L Rizzo, E Morgando.   

Abstract

Eighteen patients (6 female, 12 male; average age 51 years, range 37-79) with clinical and radiological evidence (MRI) of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) were examined. The subjects were divided into two groups depending on whether radiology indicated single level (9 patients) or multilevel (9 patients) compression of the cervical cord. All of the patients underwent surgical decompression. Seriate exam with trans-cranial magnetic stimulation was performed in double session before surgery, and 3 and 12 months after surgery. The follow-up study of these patients revealed a statistically significant neurophysiological improvement only in those patients with single-level compression. In these cases, the cervical cord pathology revealed by MRI signal hyperintensity in T2 may at least partially consist of an edematous component and/or an initial demyelinization that has still a chance of recovery. In patients with multilevel damage, the compression may cause irreversible lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7591676     DOI: 10.1007/BF02282995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0392-0461


  11 in total

1.  The contribution of magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex to the diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Correlation of central motor conduction to distal and proximal upper limb muscles with clinical and MRI findings.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; D Restuccia; C Colosimo; P Tonali
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-10

2.  Clinical evaluation of magnetic stimulation in cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  D J Jaskolski; J A Jarratt; J Jakubowski
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.596

3.  Magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  A Maertens de Noordhout; J M Remacle; J L Pepin; J D Born; P J Delwaide
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Central motor conduction times using transcranial stimulation and F wave latencies.

Authors:  L R Robinson; P Jantra; I C MacLean
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Functional deficits of central sensory and motor pathways in patients with cervical spinal stenosis: a study of SEPs and EMG responses to non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  H Masur; C E Elger; K Render; G Fahrendorf; A C Ludolph
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec

6.  Considerations for safety in the use of extracranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  W F Agnew; D B McCreery
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Clinical evaluation of conduction time measurements in central motor pathways using magnetic stimulation of human brain.

Authors:  A T Barker; I L Freeston; R Jabinous; J A Jarratt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex.

Authors:  A T Barker; R Jalinous; I L Freeston
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Usefulness of motor evoked potentials in compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  M De Mattei; B Paschero; A Sciarretta; O Davini; D Cocito
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06

10.  Estimation of normal motor conduction velocity of spinal cord by using transcranial electric stimulation and F-wave study.

Authors:  C W Chang; I N Lien
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.