Literature DB >> 33439857

Predicting evolutionary change at the DNA level in a natural Mimulus population.

Patrick J Monnahan1, Jack Colicchio1, Lila Fishman2, Stuart J Macdonald3, John K Kelly3.   

Abstract

Evolution by natural selection occurs when the frequencies of genetic variants change because individuals differ in Darwinian fitness components such as survival or reproductive success. Differential fitness has been demonstrated in field studies of many organisms, but it remains unclear how well we can quantitatively predict allele frequency changes from fitness measurements. Here, we characterize natural selection on millions of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome of the annual plant Mimulus guttatus. We use fitness estimates to calibrate population genetic models that effectively predict allele frequency changes into the next generation. Hundreds of SNPs experienced "male selection" in 2013 with one allele at each SNP elevated in frequency among successful male gametes relative to the entire population of adults. In the following generation, allele frequencies at these SNPs consistently shifted in the predicted direction. A second year of study revealed that SNPs had effects on both viability and reproductive success with pervasive trade-offs between fitness components. SNPs favored by male selection were, on average, detrimental to survival. These trade-offs (antagonistic pleiotropy and temporal fluctuations in fitness) may be essential to the long-term maintenance of alleles. Despite the challenges of measuring selection in the wild, the strong correlation between predicted and observed allele frequency changes suggests that population genetic models have a much greater role to play in forward-time prediction of evolutionary change.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33439857      PMCID: PMC7837469          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Genet        ISSN: 1553-7390            Impact factor:   5.917


  68 in total

Review 1.  Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Testing the rare-alleles model of quantitative variation by artificial selection.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  PREDICTING MICROEVOLUTIONARY RESPONSES TO DIRECTIONAL SELECTION ON HERITABLE VARIATION.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE TRAITS: BIASES DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL COVARIANCES BETWEEN TRAITS AND FITNESS.

Authors:  Mark D Rausher
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Supergenes and complex phenotypes.

Authors:  Tanja Schwander; Romain Libbrecht; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Stick insect genomes reveal natural selection's role in parallel speciation.

Authors:  Víctor Soria-Carrasco; Zachariah Gompert; Aaron A Comeault; Timothy E Farkas; Thomas L Parchman; J Spencer Johnston; C Alex Buerkle; Jeffrey L Feder; Jens Bast; Tanja Schwander; Scott P Egan; Bernard J Crespi; Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Selection and microevolution of coat pattern are cryptic in a wild population of sheep.

Authors:  J Gratten; J G Pilkington; E A Brown; T H Clutton-Brock; J M Pemberton; J Slate
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Strong selection genome-wide enhances fitness trade-offs across environments and episodes of selection.

Authors:  Jill T Anderson; Cheng-Ruei Lee; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Microevolution in time and space: SNP analysis of historical DNA reveals dynamic signatures of selection in Atlantic cod.

Authors:  Nina O Therkildsen; Jakob Hemmer-Hansen; Thomas D Als; Douglas P Swain; M Joanne Morgan; Edward A Trippel; Stephen R Palumbi; Dorte Meldrup; Einar E Nielsen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Single-generation estimates of individual fitness as proxies for long-term genetic contribution.

Authors:  Jon E Brommer; Lars Gustafsson; Hannu Pietiäinen; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  3 in total

1.  The promise and deceit of genomic selection component analyses.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Allele frequency divergence reveals ubiquitous influence of positive selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jason Bertram
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 5.917

3.  Sex-specific natural selection on SNPs in Silene latifolia.

Authors:  Lynda F Delph; Keely E Brown; Luis Diego Ríos; John K Kelly
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2022-05-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.