Literature DB >> 28568666

THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE TRAITS: BIASES DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL COVARIANCES BETWEEN TRAITS AND FITNESS.

Mark D Rausher1.   

Abstract

The use of regression techniques for estimating the direction and magnitude of selection from measurements on phenotypes has become widespread in field studies. A potential problem with these techniques is that environmental correlations between fitness and the traits examined may produce biased estimates of selection gradients. This report demonstrates that the phenotypic covariance between fitness and a trait, used as an estimate of the selection differential in estimating selection gradients, has two components: a component induced by selection itself and a component due to the effect of environmental factors on fitness. The second component is shown to be responsible for biases in estimates of selection gradients. The use of regressions involving genotypic and breeding values instead of phenotypic values can yield estimates of selection gradients that are not biased by environmental covariances. Statistical methods for estimating the coefficients of such regressions, and for testing for biases in regressions involving phenotypic values, are described. © 1992 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Biased estimates; environmental covariance; fitness; quantitative traits; selection gradients

Year:  1992        PMID: 28568666     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02070.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  61 in total

1.  Natural selection on light response curve parameters in the herbaceous annual, Impatiens capensis.

Authors:  M Shane Heschel; John R Stinchcombe; Kent E Holsinger; Johanna Schmitt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Viability selection prior to trait expression is an essential component of natural selection.

Authors:  Julius P Mojica; John K Kelly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Variation in carbon isotope discrimination in relation to plant performance in a natural population of Cryptantha flava.

Authors:  B B Casper; I N Forseth; D A Wait
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Evolutionary optimum for male sexual traits characterized using the multivariate Robertson-Price Identity.

Authors:  Matthieu Delcourt; Mark W Blows; J David Aguirre; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A general definition of the heritable variation that determines the potential of a population to respond to selection.

Authors:  Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

7.  Heritable Micro-environmental Variance Covaries with Fitness in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Katrina McGuigan; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evidence that divergent selection shapes a developmental cline in a forest tree species complex.

Authors:  João Costa E Silva; Peter A Harrison; Robert Wiltshire; Brad M Potts
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Direct and indirect selection on floral pigmentation by pollinators and seed predators in a color polymorphic South African shrub.

Authors:  Jane E Carlson; Kent E Holsinger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Non-additive effects of genotypic diversity increase floral abundance and abundance of floral visitors.

Authors:  Mark A Genung; Jean-Philippe Lessard; Claire B Brown; Windy A Bunn; Melissa A Cregger; W M Nicholas Reynolds; Emmi Felker-Quinn; Mary L Stevenson; Amanda S Hartley; Gregory M Crutsinger; Jennifer A Schweitzer; Joseph K Bailey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.