Literature DB >> 33439420

Concordance of the 21-gene assay between core needle biopsy and resection specimens in early breast cancer patients.

Peng Qi1,2,3, Yu Yang1,2,3, Qian-Ming Bai1,2,3, Tian Xue1,2,3, Min Ren1,2,3, Qian-Lan Yao1,2,3, Wen-Tao Yang1,2,3, Xiao-Yan Zhou4,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant therapy decisions may be partly based on the results of a multigene quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assay: the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) test of resection specimens. When necessary, core needle biopsy (CNB) may be considered as a surrogate. Here, we evaluated the concordance in gene expression according to results from RT-PCR-based RS testing between paired CNBs and resection specimens.
METHODS: CNBs and resection specimens from 50 breast cancer (BC) patients were tested to calculate RSs. First, we examined the concordance of the ER, PR and HER-2 status of tissue samples indicated by immunohistochemical (IHC) and RT-PCR analyses. Then, we compared the IHC findings of ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 staining across paired samples. Ultimately, the RS and single-gene results for ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 were explored between paired samples.
RESULTS: The concordance between IHC and RT-PCR was 100%, 80.0% and 100% for ER, PR and HER-2, respectively, in both resection specimens and CNBs. The concordance for IHC ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 status was 100%, 94.0%, 52.0% and 82.0%, respectively, between paired samples. RS results from paired samples showed a strong correlation. The overall concordance in RS group classification between samples was 74%, 72% and 78% based on traditional cutoffs, TAILORx cutoffs and ASCO guidelines, respectively. ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 were modestly- to- strongly correlated between paired samples according to the RT-PCR results.
CONCLUSION: A modest- to- strong correlation of ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 gene expression and RS between CNBs and resection specimens was observed in the present study. The 21-gene RS test could be reliably performed on CNBs. ER, PR and HER-2 status showed remarkable concordance between the IHC and RT-PCR analyses. The concordance between paired samples was high for the IHC ER, PR and Ki-67 results and low for HER-2.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Core needle biopsy; Genomic profiling; Predictive biomarkers; Resection specimen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33439420      PMCID: PMC7804587          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06075-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  73 in total

1.  Molecular pathology of breast cancer: what a pathologist needs to know.

Authors:  Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Jiemin Ma; Zhaohui Zou; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 3.  Molecular evolution of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter T Simpson; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Theodora Gale; Sunil R Lakhani
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 4.  Proliferation is the strongest prognosticator in node-negative breast cancer: significance, error sources, alternatives and comparison with molecular prognostic markers.

Authors:  Jan P A Baak; Einar Gudlaugsson; Ivar Skaland; Lydia Hui Ru Guo; Jan Klos; Tone Hoel Lende; Håvard Søiland; Emiel A M Janssen; Axel Zur Hausen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Risk factors for breast cancer according to estrogen and progesterone receptor status.

Authors:  Graham A Colditz; Bernard A Rosner; Wendy Y Chen; Michelle D Holmes; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer: the importance of accurate human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing.

Authors:  David G Hicks; Swati Kulkarni
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. An NSABP update.

Authors:  B Fisher; M Bauer; D L Wickerham; C K Redmond; E R Fisher; A B Cruz; R Foster; B Gardner; H Lerner; R Margolese
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Progress in adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Noam F Pondé; Dimitrios Zardavas; Martine Piccart
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Breast cancer: relationship between the size of the primary tumour and the probability of metastatic dissemination.

Authors:  S Koscielny; M Tubiana; M G Lê; A J Valleron; H Mouriesse; G Contesso; D Sarrazin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  The prevalence and predictors of adjuvant chemotherapy use among patients treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.

Authors:  Tal Sella; Olga Kantor; Anna Weiss; Ann H Partridge; Otto Metzger; Tari A King
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.624

2.  Is the 21-Gene Recurrence Score on Core Needle Biopsy Equivalent to Surgical Specimen in Early-Stage Breast Cancer? A Comparison of Gene Expression Between Paired Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens.

Authors:  Javier I J Orozco; Shu-Ching Chang; Diego M Marzese; Janie G Grumley; Chikako Matsuba; Miquel Ensenyat-Mendez; Gary L Grunkemeier
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Ki-67 and breast cancer prognosis: does it matter if Ki-67 level is examined using preoperative biopsy or postoperative specimen?

Authors:  Soon Bo Choi; Jung Min Park; Jee Hyun Ahn; Jieon Go; Jeeye Kim; Hyung Seok Park; Seung Il Kim; Byeong-Woo Park; Seho Park
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  High concordance of 70-gene recurrence risk signature and 80-gene molecular subtyping signature between core needle biopsy and surgical resection specimens in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer A Crozier; Julie Barone; Pat Whitworth; Abraham Cheong; Robert Maganini; Jose Perez Tamayo; Patricia Dauer; Shiyu Wang; William Audeh; Annuska M Glas
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.885

5.  How Reliable Are Gene Expression-Based and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers Assessed on a Core-Needle Biopsy? A Study of Paired Core-Needle Biopsies and Surgical Specimens in Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hani Saghir; Srinivas Veerla; Martin Malmberg; Lisa Rydén; Anna Ehinger; Lao H Saal; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Åke Borg; Cecilia Hegardt; Christer Larsson; Alaa Haidar; Ingrid Hedenfalk; Niklas Loman; Siker Kimbung
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.575

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.