Literature DB >> 33438149

Listener characteristics differentially affect self-reported and physiological measures of effort associated with two challenging listening conditions.

Alexander L Francis1, Tessa Bent2, Jennifer Schumaker3, Jordan Love3, Noah Silbert4.   

Abstract

Listeners vary in their ability to understand speech in adverse conditions. Differences in both cognitive and linguistic capacities play a role, but increasing evidence suggests that such factors may contribute differentially depending on the listening challenge. Here, we used multilevel modeling to evaluate contributions of individual differences in age, hearing thresholds, vocabulary, selective attention, working memory capacity, personality traits, and noise sensitivity to variability in measures of comprehension and listening effort in two listening conditions. A total of 35 participants completed a battery of cognitive and linguistic tests as well as a spoken story comprehension task using (1) native-accented English speech masked by speech-shaped noise and (2) nonnative accented English speech without masking. Masker levels were adjusted individually to ensure each participant would show (close to) equivalent word recognition performance across the two conditions. Dependent measures included comprehension tests results, self-rated effort, and electrodermal, cardiovascular, and facial electromyographic measures associated with listening effort. Results showed varied patterns of responsivity across different dependent measures as well as across listening conditions. In particular, results suggested that working memory capacity may play a greater role in the comprehension of nonnative accented speech than noise-masked speech, while hearing acuity and personality may have a stronger influence on physiological responses affected by demands of understanding speech in noise. Furthermore, electrodermal measures may be more strongly affected by affective response to noise-related interference while cardiovascular responses may be more strongly affected by demands on working memory and lexical access.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive and attentional control; Physiological psychology; Speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33438149     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02195-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  63 in total

1.  Physiological correlates of the big 5: autonomic responses to video presentations.

Authors:  Claudia Chloe Brumbaugh; Ravi Kothuri; Carl Marci; Caleb Siefert; Donald D Pfaff
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2013-12

2.  Cognitive predictors of perceptual adaptation to accented speech.

Authors:  Briony Banks; Emma Gowen; Kevin J Munro; Patti Adank
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Individual differences in the perception of regional, nonnative, and disordered speech varieties.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Melissa Baese-Berk; Stephanie A Borrie; Megan McKee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A relationship between processing speech in noise and dysarthric speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Melissa Baese-Berk; Kristin Van Engen; Tessa Bent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  The metrics of cardiac chronotropism: biometric perspectives.

Authors:  G G Berntson; J T Cacioppo; K S Quigley
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Metabolic and cardiorespiratory measures of mental effort: the effects of level of difficulty in a working memory task.

Authors:  R W Backs; K A Seljos
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 7.  Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 8.  Natural selective attention: orienting and emotion.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 9.  How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.

Authors:  Jana Besser; Thomas Koelewijn; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; Joost M Festen
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-08-13

10.  Listening Effort: Order Effects and Core Executive Functions.

Authors:  K Jonas Brännström; Elisabeth Karlsson; Sebastian Waechter; Tobias Kastberg
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quantifying the Effects of Motivation on Listening Effort: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peter J Carolan; Antje Heinrich; Kevin J Munro; Rebecca E Millman
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.