Literature DB >> 25920852

Cognitive predictors of perceptual adaptation to accented speech.

Briony Banks1, Emma Gowen2, Kevin J Munro1, Patti Adank1.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of inhibition, vocabulary knowledge, and working memory on perceptual adaptation to accented speech. One hundred young, normal-hearing adults listened to sentences spoken in a constructed, unfamiliar accent presented in speech-shaped background noise. Speech Reception Thresholds (SRTs) corresponding to 50% speech recognition accuracy provided a measurement of adaptation to the accented speech. Stroop, vocabulary knowledge, and working memory tests were performed to measure cognitive ability. Participants adapted to the unfamiliar accent as revealed by a decrease in SRTs over time. Better inhibition (lower Stroop scores) predicted greater and faster adaptation to the unfamiliar accent. Vocabulary knowledge predicted better recognition of the unfamiliar accent, while working memory had a smaller, indirect effect on speech recognition mediated by vocabulary score. Results support a top-down model for successful adaptation to, and recognition of, accented speech; they add to recent theories that allocate a prominent role for executive function to effective speech comprehension in adverse listening conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25920852     DOI: 10.1121/1.4916265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Effects of listener age and native language on perception of accented and unaccented sentences.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Maya S Freund; Peter J Fitzgibbons; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Impaired perceptual phonetic plasticity in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Christopher C Heffner; Emily B Myers; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Examining the context benefit in older adults: A combined behavioral-electrophysiologic word identification study.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Christian Brodbeck; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.054

4.  Cutting Through the Noise: Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy and Individual Differences in Speech Understanding Among Listeners With Normal Audiograms.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Lori L Holt; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Effects of Listener Age and Native Language Experience on Recognition of Accented and Unaccented English Words.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Rebecca E Bieber; David A Jara Ureta; Maya S Freund; Peter J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  Improving older adults' understanding of challenging speech: Auditory training, rapid adaptation and perceptual learning.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Semantic context and stimulus variability independently affect rapid adaptation to non-native English speech in young adults.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Younger and older adults show non-linear, stimulus-dependent performance during early stages of auditory training for non-native English.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Anna R Tinnemore; Grace Yeni-Komshian; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Audiovisual cues benefit recognition of accented speech in noise but not perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Briony Banks; Emma Gowen; Kevin J Munro; Patti Adank
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Neural bases of accented speech perception.

Authors:  Patti Adank; Helen E Nuttall; Briony Banks; Daniel Kennedy-Higgins
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.