Literature DB >> 33436664

Mesh patch and anchors can improve clinical results of prosthetic replacement after resection of primary proximal humerus malignant tumor.

Yongkun Yang1, Yuan Li1, Weifeng Liu1, Xiaohui Niu2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional results, complications and related factors of prosthesis reconstruction after malignant tumor resection of primary proximal humeral, and also evaluate whether soft tissue reconstruction with mesh patch and anchors can improve clinical results. From 2002 to 2016, forty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The pathological diagnosis contained 27 cases of osteosarcoma, 7 cases of chondrosarcoma and other primary malignant bone tumors. Both mesh patch and anchors were used in the reconstruction of joint capsule and the surrounding soft tissues in 27 cases. The mean postoperative follow-up was 60.6 months. The average active abduction angle and passive abduction angle was 33.5 (5-71) degrees and 72.4 (52-104) degrees. The prosthetic humeral head displacement was over 2 cm in 5 cases (12.2%). The average MSTS score was 23.1. The overall 5-year survival rate of prosthesis was 88.2%. The length of osteotomy, whether preserving deltoid muscle, whether applying mesh patch and anchors had significant effects on the abduction angle of shoulder joint; the length of osteotomy, whether applying mesh patch and anchors had significant effects on the degree of upward displacement of prosthesis. The application of both mesh patch and anchors in prosthesis reconstruction achieved more stable result and better function of shoulder joint. To ensure the stability of shoulder joint and the firm wrapping of surrounding soft tissue are key factors affecting the postoperative function.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33436664      PMCID: PMC7804124          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78959-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  29 in total

1.  Shoulder prosthesis in reconstruction of the scapulohumeral girdle after wide resection to treat malignant neoformation of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  M Manili; N Fredella; F S Santori
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar

2.  Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. Long-term results.

Authors:  D Kumar; R J Grimer; A Abudu; S R Carter; R M Tillman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-07

3.  Endoprosthetic replacement versus cement spacer in reconstruction of proximal humerus after tumor resection: Cost and benefits.

Authors:  Awad Abdelmonem Rafalla; El Sayed Abdelhalim Abdullah
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2017 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.118

4.  Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  A C Ross; J N Wilson; J T Scales
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-08

5.  Evolution of surgical treatment for sarcomas of proximal humerus in children: retrospective review at a single institute over 30 years.

Authors:  Marco Manfrini; Akshay Tiwari; John Ham; Marco Colangeli; Mario Mercuri
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Reconstruction with non-vascularised fibular grafts after resection of bone tumours.

Authors:  A H Krieg; F Hefti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-02

Review 7.  Re-implantation of autoclaved bone segments in musculoskeletal tumor surgery. Clinical experience in 9 patients followed for 1.1-8.4 years and review of the literature.

Authors:  P Böhm; R Springfeld; H Springer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Clavicula pro humero reconstruction after wide resection of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Satoshi Tsukushi; Yoshihiro Nishida; Mitsuru Takahashi; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Experience with cemented large segment endoprostheses for tumors.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sharma; Robert E Turcotte; Marc H Isler; Cindy Wong
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Proximal humerus reconstruction after tumour resection: biological versus endoprosthetic reconstruction.

Authors:  Michiel A J van de Sande; P D Sander Dijkstra; Antonie H M Taminiau
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.