Literature DB >> 33434470

Learning the same motor task twice impairs its retention in a time- and dose-dependent manner.

R Hamel1,2, L Dallaire-Jean2, É De La Fontaine2, J F Lepage1, P M Bernier2.   

Abstract

Anterograde interference emerges when two differing tasks are learned in close temporal proximity, an effect repeatedly attributed to a competition between differing task memories. However, recent development alternatively suggests that initial learning may trigger a refractory period that occludes neuroplasticity and impairs subsequent learning, consequently mediating interference independently of memory competition. Accordingly, this study tested the hypothesis that interference can emerge when the same motor task is being learned twice, that is when competition between memories is prevented. In a first experiment, the inter-session interval (ISI) between two identical motor learning sessions was manipulated to be 2 min, 1 h or 24 h. Results revealed that retention of the second session was impaired as compared to the first one when the ISI was 2 min but not when it was 1 h or 24 h, indicating a time-dependent process. Results from a second experiment replicated those of the first one and revealed that adding a third motor learning session with a 2 min ISI further impaired retention, indicating a dose-dependent process. Results from a third experiment revealed that the retention impairments did not take place when a learning session was preceded by simple rehearsal of the motor task without concurrent learning, thus ruling out fatigue and confirming that retention is impaired specifically when preceded by a learning session. Altogether, the present results suggest that competing memories is not the sole mechanism mediating anterograde interference and introduce the possibility that a time- and dose-dependent refractory period-independent of fatigue-also contributes to its emergence. One possibility is that learning transiently perturbs the homeostasis of learning-related neuronal substrates. Introducing additional learning when homeostasis is still perturbed may not only impair performance improvements, but also memory formation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterograde interference; motor learning; motor memories; retention; visuomotor adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33434470      PMCID: PMC7892403          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  54 in total

Review 1.  Repetition and variation in motor practice: A review of neural correlates.

Authors:  Guilherme M Lage; Herbert Ugrinowitsch; Tércio Apolinário-Souza; Márcio Mário Vieira; Maicon R Albuquerque; Rodolfo Novellino Benda
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  The time course of off-line motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Daniel Z Press; Melynda D Casement; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Edwin M Robertson
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-09

3.  Explicit contextual information selectively contributes to predictive switching of internal models.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamizu; Norikazu Sugimoto; Rieko Osu; Kiyoka Tsutsui; Kouichi Sugiyama; Yasuhiro Wada; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

5.  Interactive contributions of intracellular calcium and protein phosphatases to massed-trials learning deficits in Hermissenda.

Authors:  I A Muzzio; R R Ramirez; A C Talk; L D Matzel
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Consolidation in human motor memory.

Authors:  T Brashers-Krug; R Shadmehr; E Bizzi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Learning multiple visuomotor transformations: adaptation and context-dependent recall.

Authors:  Sima Mistry; Jose L Contreras-Vidal
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.422

8.  Motor learning interference is proportional to occlusion of LTP-like plasticity.

Authors:  Gabriela Cantarero; Byron Tang; Rebecca O'Malley; Rachel Salas; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Hebbian plasticity requires compensatory processes on multiple timescales.

Authors:  Friedemann Zenke; Wulfram Gerstner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Savings upon Re-Aiming in Visuomotor Adaptation.

Authors:  J Ryan Morehead; Salman E Qasim; Matthew J Crossley; Richard Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  2 in total

1.  Anterograde interference emerges along a gradient as a function of task similarity: A behavioural study.

Authors:  Raphaël Hamel; Jean-François Lepage; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.698

2.  The effects of post-learning alcohol ingestion on human motor memory consolidation.

Authors:  Raphael Hamel; Olivier Demers; Jean-Francois Lepage; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.698

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.