Literature DB >> 33433742

Electromagnetic interference between implantable cardiac devices and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a review.

Jonathan S Gordon1, Elizabeth J Maynes1, Thomas J O'Malley2, Behzad B Pavri3, Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili4.   

Abstract

Many patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) have other, co-existing implantable cardiac devices. While such devices often function appropriately, there is potential for electromagnetic interference (EMI). A literature review was performed to identify cases of EMI between CF-LVAD and other implanted cardiac devices to better understand their etiology, outcomes, and the strategies used to overcome such interference. The cases identified included interference between CF-LVAD and pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy. The EMI reported in the current literature can be broken down into two general categories: interference leading to difficulty establishing telemetry and interference leading to impaired electrical signal sensing. Such interference led to inappropriate shock delivery in some cases. The type of interference, and thus treatments, differed and were device dependent. The strategies employed to reduce interference included metal shielding, physical manipulation to increase the distance between devices, and even exchange of the implanted device with another brand of the same class. To avoid such EMI in the future, physicians must be aware of the reported interference between certain devices, and manufacturers must work more closely to increase the compatibility of implanted cardiac devices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CF-LVAD; CRT; EMI; Electromagnetic interference; ICD; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Left ventricular assist device; Pacemaker

Year:  2021        PMID: 33433742     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-020-00930-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  32 in total

Review 1.  Posttraumatic stress and the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patient: what the electrophysiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Samuel F Sears; Jessica D Hauf; Kari Kirian; Garrett Hazelton; Jamie B Conti
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-04

2.  2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Andrew E Epstein; John P DiMarco; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Roger A Freedman; Leonard S Gettes; A Marc Gillinov; Gabriel Gregoratos; Stephen C Hammill; David L Hayes; Mark A Hlatky; L Kristin Newby; Richard L Page; Mark H Schoenfeld; Michael J Silka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Michael O Sweeney; Cynthia M Tracy; Andrew E Epstein; Dawood Darbar; John P DiMarco; Sandra B Dunbar; N A Mark Estes; T Bruce Ferguson; Stephen C Hammill; Pamela E Karasik; Mark S Link; Joseph E Marine; Mark H Schoenfeld; Amit J Shanker; Michael J Silka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; William G Stevenson; Paul D Varosy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database Annual Report: Evolving Indications, Outcomes, and Scientific Partnerships.

Authors:  Robert L Kormos; Jennifer Cowger; Francis D Pagani; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Daniel J Goldstein; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Robert S Higgins; Lynne W Stevenson; Josef Stehlik; Pavan Atluri; Kathleen L Grady; James K Kirklin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Adverse interaction between a left ventricular assist device and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Jennifer Cowger Matthews; Daphne Betley; Fred Morady; Frank Pelosi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-03-31

5.  Surgical management of the patient with an implanted cardiac device: implications of electromagnetic interference.

Authors:  J D Madigan; A F Choudhri; J Chen; H M Spotnitz; M C Oz; N Edwards
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Overcoming electromagnetic interference by LVADs on ICD function by shielding the ICD programmer wand and extension cable.

Authors:  Angelo Biviano; Donna Mancini; Yoshifumi Naka; Jerry Arellano; Hasan Garan
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  The role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Alan D Enriquez; Brandon Calenda; Marc A Miller; Anelechi C Anyanwu; Sean P Pinney
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-07-19

8.  Implantable defibrillator with left ventricular assist device compatibility.

Authors:  Hanno Oswald; Gunnar Klein; Martin Strüber; Ajmal Gardiwal
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-02-17

9.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2019 Annual Report: The Changing Landscape of Devices and Indications.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Joseph C Cleveland; Jennifer Cowger; Robert S Higgins; Daniel J Goldstein; Mary Keebler; James K Kirklin; Susan L Myers; Christopher T Salerno; Josef Stehlik; Felix Fernandez; Vinay Badhwar; Francis D Pagani; Pavan Atluri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Utilization Patterns, Related Procedures, and Complications.

Authors:  Paulino A Alvarez; Brett W Sperry; Antonio L Pérez; Dmitry M Yaranov; Varinder Randhawa; Jacob Luthman; Daniel J Cantillon; Randall C Starling
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.