Amy S Garrett1, Kiki D Chang2, Manpreet K Singh3, Casey C Armstrong4, Patricia D Walshaw4, David J Miklowitz4. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA. 2. Private practice, Palo Alto, CA, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with mood disorders may benefit from psychosocial interventions through changes in brain networks underlying emotion processing. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate treatment-related changes in emotion processing networks in youth at familial high risk for bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: Youth, ages 9-17, were randomly assigned to family-focused therapy for high-risk youth (FFT-HR) or an active comparison treatment, Enhanced Care (EC). Before and after these 4-month treatments, participants underwent fMRI while viewing happy, fearful, and calm facial expressions. Twenty youth in FFT-HR and 20 in EC were included in analyses of pre- to post-treatment changes in activation across the whole brain. Significant clusters were assessed for correlation with mood symptom improvement. RESULTS: In the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), activation increased from pre- to post-treatment in the FFT-HR group and decreased in the EC group. Insula activation decreased in the FFT-HR group and did not change in the EC group. Across both treatments, decreasing activation in the hippocampus and amygdala was correlated with pre- to post-treatment improvement in hypomania, while increasing activation in the DLPFC was correlated with pre- to post-treatment improvement in depression. DISCUSSION: Psychosocial treatment addresses abnormalities in emotion regulation networks in youth at high risk for BD. Increased prefrontal cortex activation suggests enhanced emotion regulation from pre- to post-treatment with FFT-HR. Improvements in family interactions may facilitate the development of prefrontal resources that provide protection against future mood episodes.
BACKGROUND: Patients with mood disorders may benefit from psychosocial interventions through changes in brain networks underlying emotion processing. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate treatment-related changes in emotion processing networks in youth at familial high risk for bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: Youth, ages 9-17, were randomly assigned to family-focused therapy for high-risk youth (FFT-HR) or an active comparison treatment, Enhanced Care (EC). Before and after these 4-month treatments, participants underwent fMRI while viewing happy, fearful, and calm facial expressions. Twenty youth in FFT-HR and 20 in EC were included in analyses of pre- to post-treatment changes in activation across the whole brain. Significant clusters were assessed for correlation with mood symptom improvement. RESULTS: In the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), activation increased from pre- to post-treatment in the FFT-HR group and decreased in the EC group. Insula activation decreased in the FFT-HR group and did not change in the EC group. Across both treatments, decreasing activation in the hippocampus and amygdala was correlated with pre- to post-treatment improvement in hypomania, while increasing activation in the DLPFC was correlated with pre- to post-treatment improvement in depression. DISCUSSION: Psychosocial treatment addresses abnormalities in emotion regulation networks in youth at high risk for BD. Increased prefrontal cortex activation suggests enhanced emotion regulation from pre- to post-treatment with FFT-HR. Improvements in family interactions may facilitate the development of prefrontal resources that provide protection against future mood episodes.
Authors: Christopher D Schneck; Kiki D Chang; Manpreet K Singh; Melissa P DelBello; David J Miklowitz Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Silvia Alonso-Lana; Noemí Moro; Peter J McKenna; Salvador Sarró; Anna Romaguera; Gemma C Monté; Teresa Maristany; José M Goikolea; Eduard Vieta; Raymond Salvador; Edith Pomarol-Clotet Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Jeffrey R Strawn; Sian Cotton; Christina M Luberto; L Rodrigo Patino; Lauren A Stahl; Wade A Weber; James C Eliassen; Richard Sears; Melissa P DelBello Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: B Birmaher; D A Brent; L Chiappetta; J Bridge; S Monga; M Baugher Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: D V Sheehan; Y Lecrubier; K H Sheehan; P Amorim; J Janavs; E Weiller; T Hergueta; R Baker; G C Dunbar Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 1998 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Salih Selek; Mark Nicoletti; Giovana B Zunta-Soares; John P Hatch; Fabiano G Nery; Koji Matsuo; Marsal Sanches; Jair C Soares Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Markus Rütgen; Carolina Pletti; Martin Tik; Christoph Kraus; Daniela Melitta Pfabigan; Ronald Sladky; Manfred Klöbl; Michael Woletz; Thomas Vanicek; Christian Windischberger; Rupert Lanzenberger; Claus Lamm Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 6.222