Literature DB >> 33432546

Imitation or Polarity Correspondence? Behavioural and Neurophysiological Evidence for the Confounding Influence of Orthogonal Spatial Compatibility on Measures of Automatic Imitation.

Kristína Czekóová1,2, Daniel Joel Shaw3,4, Martin Lamoš5, Beáta Špiláková3,6, Miguel Salazar3, Milan Brázdil3,7.   

Abstract

During social interactions, humans tend to imitate one another involuntarily. To investigate the neurocognitive mechanisms driving this tendency, researchers often employ stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) tasks to assess the influence that action observation has on action execution. This is referred to as automatic imitation (AI). The stimuli used frequently in SRC procedures to elicit AI often confound action-related with other nonsocial influences on behaviour; however, in response to the rotated hand-action stimuli employed increasingly, AI partly reflects unspecific up-right/down-left biases in stimulus-response mapping. Despite an emerging awareness of this confounding orthogonal spatial-compatibility effect, psychological and neuroscientific research into social behaviour continues to employ these stimuli to investigate AI. To increase recognition of this methodological issue, the present study measured the systematic influence of orthogonal spatial effects on behavioural and neurophysiological measures of AI acquired with rotated hand-action stimuli in SRC tasks. In Experiment 1, behavioural data from a large sample revealed that complex orthogonal spatial effects exert an influence on AI over and above any topographical similarity between observed and executed actions. Experiment 2 reproduced this finding in a more systematic, within-subject design, and high-density electroencephalography revealed that electrocortical expressions of AI elicited also are modulated by orthogonal spatial compatibility. Finally, source localisations identified a collection of cortical areas sensitive to this spatial confound, including nodes of the multiple-demand and semantic-control networks. These results indicate that AI measured on SRC procedures with the rotated hand stimuli used commonly might reflect neurocognitive mechanisms associated with spatial associations rather than imitative tendencies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic imitation; Orthogonal spatial compatibility; Polarity correspondence; Semantic control

Year:  2021        PMID: 33432546      PMCID: PMC7994238          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-020-00860-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  60 in total

1.  Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.

Authors:  Ty W Boyer; Matthew R Longo; Bennett I Bertenthal
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-02-09

2.  Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.

Authors:  Bennett I Bertenthal; Matthew R Longo; Adam Kosobud
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Methodological issues in measures of imitative reaction times.

Authors:  Michael D Aicken; Andrew D Wilson; Justin H G Williams; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Ventral fronto-temporal pathway supporting cognitive control of episodic memory retrieval.

Authors:  Jennifer Barredo; Ilke Öztekin; David Badre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  In praise of a model but not its conclusions: commentary on Cooper, Catmur, and Heyes (2012).

Authors:  Bennett I Bertenthal; Matthias Scheutz
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-04-22

Review 6.  The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry.

Authors:  Tanya L Chartrand; Jessica L Lakin
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Definition and characterization of an extended multiple-demand network.

Authors:  J A Camilleri; V I Müller; P Fox; A R Laird; F Hoffstaedter; T Kalenscher; S B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain.

Authors:  Svenja Caspers; Karl Zilles; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 10.  The contribution of brain sub-cortical loops in the expression and acquisition of action understanding abilities.

Authors:  Daniele Caligiore; Giovanni Pezzulo; R Chris Miall; Gianluca Baldassarre
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.