Literature DB >> 17070640

Methodological issues in measures of imitative reaction times.

Michael D Aicken1, Andrew D Wilson, Justin H G Williams, Mark Mon-Williams.   

Abstract

Ideomotor (IM) theory suggests that observing someone else perform an action activates an internal motor representation of that behaviour within the observer. Evidence supporting the case for an ideomotor theory of imitation has come from studies that show imitative responses to be faster than the same behavioural measures performed in response to spatial cues. In an attempt to replicate these findings, we manipulated the salience of the visual cue and found that we could reverse the advantage of the imitative cue over the spatial cue. We suggest that participants utilised a simple visuomotor mechanism to perform all aspects of this task, with performance being driven by the relative visual salience of the stimuli. Imitation is a more complex motor skill that would constitute an inefficient strategy for rapid performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17070640     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  7 in total

Review 1.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  E Gowen; E Poliakoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07

2.  Methodological problems undermine tests of the ideo-motor conjecture.

Authors:  Erik Jansson; Andrew D Wilson; Justin H G Williams; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Grasp cueing and joint attention.

Authors:  Nadja Tschentscher; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Controlling automatic imitative tendencies: interactions between mirror neuron and cognitive control systems.

Authors:  Katy A Cross; Salvatore Torrisi; Elizabeth A Reynolds Losin; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The Effect of Money Priming on Self-Focus in the Imitation-Inhibition Task.

Authors:  Oliver Genschow; Johannes Schuler; Emiel Cracco; Marcel Brass; Michaela Wänke
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2019-11

6.  Imitation or Polarity Correspondence? Behavioural and Neurophysiological Evidence for the Confounding Influence of Orthogonal Spatial Compatibility on Measures of Automatic Imitation.

Authors:  Kristína Czekóová; Daniel Joel Shaw; Martin Lamoš; Beáta Špiláková; Miguel Salazar; Milan Brázdil
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Imitation of hand and tool actions is effector-independent.

Authors:  M van Elk; H T van Schie; H Bekkering
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.