Literature DB >> 23607707

In praise of a model but not its conclusions: commentary on Cooper, Catmur, and Heyes (2012).

Bennett I Bertenthal1, Matthias Scheutz.   

Abstract

Cooper et al. (this issue) develop an interactive activation model of spatial and imitative compatibilities that simulates the key results from Catmur and Heyes (2011) and thus conclude that both compatibilities are mediated by the same processes since their single model can predict all the results. Although the model is impressive, the conclusions are premature because they are based on an incomplete review of the relevant literature and because the model includes some questionable assumptions. Moreover, a competing model (Scheutz & Bertenthal, 2012) is introduced that suggests the two compatibilities are not mediated by the same processes. We propose that more research is necessary before concluding that spatial and imitative compatibilities are mediated by the same processes.
Copyright © 2013 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23607707     DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  2 in total

1.  Imitation or Polarity Correspondence? Behavioural and Neurophysiological Evidence for the Confounding Influence of Orthogonal Spatial Compatibility on Measures of Automatic Imitation.

Authors:  Kristína Czekóová; Daniel Joel Shaw; Martin Lamoš; Beáta Špiláková; Miguel Salazar; Milan Brázdil
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  The controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other control.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Jeremy Hogeveen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.