Literature DB >> 3772049

Somesthetic sensitivity in young and elderly humans.

D R Kenshalo.   

Abstract

Absolute thresholds were measured on 27 young (ages 19 to 31) and 21 elderly (ages 55 to 84) humans to six modes of cutaneous stimulation (single ramp-and-hold skin indentations--tactile, vibration at 40 and 250 Hz, temperature increases and decreases, and noxious heat) at two sites, the thenar eminence and the plantar foot. Comparisons of the elderly and young groups showed that elderly persons were significantly, p less than or equal to .001, less sensitive than young individuals to mechanical stimuli (tactile and vibration) at both sites. No significant differences were found in thresholds to thermal stimuli (warm-, cold-, and heat-pain) at either site except elderly feet were significantly, p less than or equal to .001, less sensitive than young feet to warm stimuli. Thresholds of elderly individuals were compared with the young group thresholds for deficits in sensitivity. All elderly participants showed deficits to one or more of the stimulus modes at one or the other site. There were significantly, p less than or equal to 0.01, more deficits to mechanical than to thermal stimuli. There was no increase in the frequency of deficits with increasing age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3772049     DOI: 10.1093/geronj/41.6.732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol        ISSN: 0022-1422


  54 in total

1.  Inert gas narcosis has no influence on thermo-tactile sensation.

Authors:  Miroljub Jakovljević; Gaj Vidmar; Igor B Mekjavic
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Normative vibrotactile thresholds measured at five European test centres.

Authors:  Christopher J Lindsell; Michael J Griffin
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Postural stabilization from fingertip contact: I. Variations in sway attenuation, perceived stability and contact forces with aging.

Authors:  François Tremblay; Annie-Claude Mireault; Liam Dessureault; Hélène Manning; Heidi Sveistrup
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Age differences in orofacial sensory thresholds.

Authors:  M W Heft; M E Robinson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Information processing limitations with aging in the visual scaling of isometric force.

Authors:  Jacob J Sosnoff; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Effects of ageing on touch.

Authors:  M M Wickremaratchi; J G Llewelyn
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Physiological correlates of age-related decline in vibrotactile sensitivity.

Authors:  Nandini Deshpande; E Jeffery Metter; Shari Ling; Robin Conwit; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Aging affects attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch.

Authors:  Rob Withagen; Simone R Caljouw
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Slowing of dexterous manipulation in old age: force and kinematic findings from the 'nut-and-rod' task.

Authors:  Kelly J Cole; Kelly M Cook; Stephanie M Hynes; Warren G Darling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Interoceptive awareness declines with age.

Authors:  Sahib S Khalsa; David Rudrauf; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.