Literature DB >> 33431803

Development and external validation of an admission risk prediction model after treatment from early intervention in psychosis services.

Stephen Puntis1, Daniel Whiting2, Sofia Pappa3,4, Belinda Lennox2.   

Abstract

Early Intervention in psychosis (EIP) teams are the gold standard treatment for first-episode psychosis (FEP). EIP is time-limited and clinicians are required to make difficult aftercare decisions that require weighing up individuals' wishes for treatment, risk of relapse, and health service capacity. Reliable decision-making tools could assist with appropriate resource allocation and better care. We aimed to develop and externally validate a readmission risk tool for application at the point of EIP discharge. All persons from EIP caseloads in two NHS Trusts were eligible for the study. We excluded those who moved out of the area or were only seen for assessment. We developed a model to predict the risk of hospital admission within a year of ending EIP treatment in one Trust and externally validated it in another. There were n = 831 participants in the development dataset and n = 1393 in the external validation dataset, with 79 (9.5%) and 162 (11.6%) admissions to inpatient hospital, respectively. Discrimination was AUC = 0.76 (95% CI 0.75; 0.77) in the development dataset and AUC = 0.70 (95% CI 0.66; 0.75) in the external dataset. Calibration plots in external validation suggested an underestimation of risk in the lower predicted probabilities and slight overestimation at predicted probabilities in the 0.1-0.2 range (calibration slope = 0.86, 95% CI 0.68; 1.05). Recalibration improved performance at lower predicted probabilities but underestimated risk at the highest range of predicted probabilities (calibration slope = 1.00, 95% CI 0.79; 1.21). We showed that a tool for predicting admission risk using routine data has good performance and could assist clinical decision-making. Refinement of the model, testing its implementation and further external validation are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33431803      PMCID: PMC7801610          DOI: 10.1038/s41398-020-01172-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Psychiatry        ISSN: 2158-3188            Impact factor:   6.222


  42 in total

Review 1.  Reviewing intuitive decision-making and uncertainty: the implications for medical education.

Authors:  Katherine H Hall
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 2.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amit X Garg; Neill K J Adhikari; Heather McDonald; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; P J Devereaux; Joseph Beyene; Justina Sam; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Moving on from early intervention for psychosis services: Service user perspectives on the facilitators and barriers of transition.

Authors:  Matthew Loughlin; Katherine Berry; Joanna Brooks; Sandra Bucci
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 2.732

4.  Transition from child to adult mental health services: needs, barriers, experiences and new models of care.

Authors:  Swaran P Singh; Helena Tuomainen
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 5.  Improving Prognostic Accuracy in Subjects at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Systematic Review of Predictive Models and Meta-analytical Sequential Testing Simulation.

Authors:  André Schmidt; Marco Cappucciati; Joaquim Radua; Grazia Rutigliano; Matteo Rocchetti; Liliana Dell'Osso; Pierluigi Politi; Stefan Borgwardt; Thomas Reilly; Lucia Valmaggia; Philip McGuire; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 6.  Models to predict relapse in psychosis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Sullivan; Kate Northstone; Caroline Gadd; Julian Walker; Ruta Margelyte; Alison Richards; Penny Whiting
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  PREDICT: a new UK prognostic model that predicts survival following surgery for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Gordon C Wishart; Elizabeth M Azzato; David C Greenberg; Jem Rashbass; Olive Kearins; Gill Lawrence; Carlos Caldas; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Transfers and transitions between child and adult mental health services.

Authors:  Moli Paul; Tamsin Ford; Tami Kramer; Zoebia Islam; Kath Harley; Swaran P Singh
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl       Date:  2013-01

9.  A population-level prediction tool for the incidence of first-episode psychosis: translational epidemiology based on cross-sectional data.

Authors:  James B Kirkbride; Daniel Jackson; Jesus Perez; David Fowler; Francis Winton; Jeremy W Coid; Robin M Murray; Peter B Jones
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Ethnicity and long-term course and outcome of psychotic disorders in a UK sample: the ÆSOP-10 study.

Authors:  Craig Morgan; Paul Fearon; Julia Lappin; Margaret Heslin; Kim Donoghue; Ben Lomas; Ulrich Reininghaus; Adanna Onyejiaka; Tim Croudace; Peter B Jones; Robin M Murray; Gillian A Doody; Paola Dazzan
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 10.671

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Prediction models in first-episode psychosis: systematic review and critical appraisal.

Authors:  Rebecca Lee; Samuel P Leighton; Lucretia Thomas; Georgios V Gkoutos; Stephen J Wood; Sarah-Jane H Fenton; Fani Deligianni; Jonathan Cavanagh; Pavan K Mallikarjun
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 10.671

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.