Maria Rodrigues da Costa1,2,3, Edgar García Manzanilla1,2, Alessia Diana1,2,4, Nienke van Staaveren1,2,5, Alberto Torres-Pitarch1,6,7, Laura Ann Boyle1, Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz8. 1. Pig Development Department, Teagasc Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland. 2. School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland. 3. Present Address: Epidemiology research unit, Scotland's rural College (SRUC), IV2 5NA Inverness, Scotland, UK. 4. Present Address: Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020, Legnaro, PD, Italy. 5. Present Address: Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada. 6. School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland. 7. Present Address: Trouw Nutrition España, Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain. 8. Pig Development Department, Teagasc Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland. Julia.CalderonDiaz@teagasc.ie.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Managing body weight (BW) variation is a challenge in farrow-to-finish farms implementing all-in/all-out (AIAO) production systems due to the lack of "off-site" facilities to segregate slow growing pigs (SGP). This case study investigated different approaches to managing BW variation in a farrow-to-finish commercial pig farm with a self-declared AIAO management and the possible implications for animal health. CASE PRESENTATION: A total of 1096 pigs (1047 pigs born within 1 week plus 49 pigs born 1 week later) were tracked until slaughter as they moved through the production stages. Piglets were individually tagged at birth and their location on the farm was recorded on a weekly basis. In total, 10.3% of pigs died during lactation. Four main cohorts of pigs were created at weaning and retrospectively identified: cohort 1 = pigs weaned at 21 days (4.5%); cohort 2 = pigs weaned at 28 days (81.0%), which was sub-divided at the end of the first nursery stage into sub-cohort 2a = pigs split at 3 weeks post-weaning (29.7%); sub-cohort 2b = pigs split at 3 weeks post-weaning from cohort 2a and split again 5 weeks post-weaning (35.5%) and sub-cohort 2c = remaining smaller size pigs from cohort 2b (10.9%); cohort 3 = pigs weaned at 35 days (2.7%) and cohort 4 = pigs weaned at 49 days (1.5%) that were later mixed with SPG, delayed pigs from other cohorts and sick/injured pigs that recovered. Four strategies to manage BW variation were identified: i) earlier weaning (cohort 1); ii) delayed weaning of SGP (cohort 3 and 4); iii) re-grading pens by BW (sub-cohorts 2a, 2b and 2c) and, iv) delayed movement of SGP to the next production stage (several pigs from all cohorts). A higher percentage of delayed pigs presented pericarditis, pleurisy and enzootic pneumonia like lesions at slaughter compared with pigs under other strategies. CONCLUSION: A variety of management practices were implemented to minimise BW variation during the production cycle. However, several cohorts of pigs were created disrupting AIAO management. Earlier weaning should only be practiced under specific circumstances where optimal animal health and welfare are guaranteed. Delayed weaning of SGP and delaying pigs to move to the next production stage could negatively affect animal health and should be avoided.
BACKGROUND: Managing body weight (BW) variation is a challenge in farrow-to-finish farms implementing all-in/all-out (AIAO) production systems due to the lack of "off-site" facilities to segregate slow growing pigs (SGP). This case study investigated different approaches to managing BW variation in a farrow-to-finish commercial pig farm with a self-declared AIAO management and the possible implications for animal health. CASE PRESENTATION: A total of 1096 pigs (1047 pigs born within 1 week plus 49 pigs born 1 week later) were tracked until slaughter as they moved through the production stages. Piglets were individually tagged at birth and their location on the farm was recorded on a weekly basis. In total, 10.3% of pigs died during lactation. Four main cohorts of pigs were created at weaning and retrospectively identified: cohort 1 = pigs weaned at 21 days (4.5%); cohort 2 = pigs weaned at 28 days (81.0%), which was sub-divided at the end of the first nursery stage into sub-cohort 2a = pigs split at 3 weeks post-weaning (29.7%); sub-cohort 2b = pigs split at 3 weeks post-weaning from cohort 2a and split again 5 weeks post-weaning (35.5%) and sub-cohort 2c = remaining smaller size pigs from cohort 2b (10.9%); cohort 3 = pigs weaned at 35 days (2.7%) and cohort 4 = pigs weaned at 49 days (1.5%) that were later mixed with SPG, delayed pigs from other cohorts and sick/injured pigs that recovered. Four strategies to manage BW variation were identified: i) earlier weaning (cohort 1); ii) delayed weaning of SGP (cohort 3 and 4); iii) re-grading pens by BW (sub-cohorts 2a, 2b and 2c) and, iv) delayed movement of SGP to the next production stage (several pigs from all cohorts). A higher percentage of delayed pigs presented pericarditis, pleurisy and enzootic pneumonia like lesions at slaughter compared with pigs under other strategies. CONCLUSION: A variety of management practices were implemented to minimise BW variation during the production cycle. However, several cohorts of pigs were created disrupting AIAO management. Earlier weaning should only be practiced under specific circumstances where optimal animal health and welfare are guaranteed. Delayed weaning of SGP and delaying pigs to move to the next production stage could negatively affect animal health and should be avoided.
Entities:
Keywords:
Animal movements; Delayed pigs; Early weaning; Pig sorting; Production flow; Swine
Authors: T G Baraldi; N R N Cruz; D A Pereira; J V B Galdeano; I R H Gatto; A F D Silva; A Panzardi; D C L Linhares; L A Mathias; L G de Oliveira Journal: Prev Vet Med Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 2.670
Authors: Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz; Alessia Diana; Laura Ann Boyle; Finola C Leonard; Máire McElroy; Shane McGettrick; John Moriarty; Edgar García Manzanilla Journal: Porcine Health Manag Date: 2017-07-05
Authors: Niels Dekker; Annemarie Bouma; Ineke Daemen; Don Klinkenberg; Leo van Leengoed; Jaap A Wagenaar; Arjan Stegeman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura A Boyle; Sandra A Edwards; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Françoise Pol; Manja Zupan Šemrov; Sabine Schütze; Janicke Nordgreen; Nadya Bozakova; Evangelia N Sossidou; Anna Valros Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2022-01-27