Literature DB >> 23825336

Identification of risk factors associated with poor lifetime growth performance in pigs.

S L Douglas1, S A Edwards, E Sutcliffe, P W Knap, I Kyriazakis.   

Abstract

During the production period from birth to slaughter there are some pigs that grow markedly slower, despite conditions that seem to support the growth of their contemporaries. This reduction in growth inevitably leads to weight variation within a group, causes difficulties with management, and results in system inefficiencies. By understanding the factors that contribute to poor growth, the performance of these slow growing pigs might be improved, thereby decreasing the overall variability at slaughter. The aim of this paper was to analyze the factors associated with poor growth performance in pigs from birth to slaughter, determine the effect of piglet birth weight (BiW) and weaning weight (WW) on lifetime growth, and investigate the capacity of small piglets to compensate for any BW deficit. Two industry databases, with individual data for approximately 40,000 and 90,000 pigs, respectively, and containing BW profiles and relevant variables, were analyzed. Body weight at birth, weaning, intermediate, and finishing stages were available as well as sex, month of birth, litter size information (number born alive and total born including still born), sow parity number, and length of gestation. Absolute and relative growth rates, based on adjusted BW for age, were calculated for each time interval and 3 types of analysis were performed: a logistic regression, a continuous linear plateau model, and a weight category analysis. For both datasets poor absolute and relative growth from birth to final BW was associated with low BiW (P < 0.001), low WW (P < 0.001), sex (P < 0.001), breed code (P < 0.001), and month of birth (P < 0.001). The linear plateau model suggested that the relationship between BiW and lifetime growth was not linear beyond 1.91 (database 1) or 1.84 (database 2) kg; the same applied to the relationship between WW at 21 d and final BW (FW) growth, which was not linear beyond 7.53 kg. Finally, the weight category analysis revealed that piglets with the lightest BiW were able to exhibit compensatory growth from BiW to FW with 74 (database 1) and 82% (database 2) moving at least 1 BW category. It is concluded that growth performance to slaughter is not solely reliant on pig BiW, with WW also playing a critical role. Additionally, piglets with BiW below the average are capable of some degree of compensatory growth; this provides the opportunity for managing them so as to improve their lifetime growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23825336     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  20 in total

1.  Birth weight affects body protein retention but not nitrogen efficiency in the later life of pigs.

Authors:  Carola M C van der Peet-Schwering; Lisanne M G Verschuren; Mette S Hedemann; Gisabeth P Binnendijk; Alfons J M Jansman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  What is good for small piglets might not be good for big piglets: The consequences of cross-fostering and creep feed provision on performance to slaughter.

Authors:  A M S Huting; K Almond; I Wellock; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effects of increased lysine and energy feeding duration prior to parturition on sow and litter performance, piglet survival, and colostrum quality.

Authors:  Kiah M Gourley; Analicia J Swanson; Joel M DeRouchey; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Robert D Goodband; Jason C Woodworth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  The effects of birth weight and estimated breeding value for protein deposition on nitrogen efficiency in growing pigs.

Authors:  Carola M C Van der Peet-Schwering; Lisanne M G Verschuren; Rob Bergsma; Mette S Hedemann; Gisabeth P Binnendijk; Alfons J M Jansman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Delaying pigs from the normal production flow is associated with health problems and poorer performance.

Authors:  Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz; Alessia Diana; Laura Ann Boyle; Finola C Leonard; Máire McElroy; Shane McGettrick; John Moriarty; Edgar García Manzanilla
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2017-07-05

6.  Dietary Supplementation of Leucine in Premating Diet Improves the Within-Litter Birth Weight Uniformity, Antioxidative Capability, and Immune Function of Primiparous SD Rats.

Authors:  Ting Liu; Bin Zuo; Wei Wang; Shilan Wang; Junjun Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Cross-Fostering Implications for Pig Mortality, Welfare and Performance.

Authors:  Julia A Calderón Díaz; Edgar García Manzanilla; Alessia Diana; Laura A Boyle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-06

8.  Once small always small? To what extent morphometric characteristics and post-weaning starter regime affect pig lifetime growth performance.

Authors:  A M S Huting; P Sakkas; I Wellock; K Almond; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-07-23

9.  Metabolomic analysis of longissimus from underperforming piglets relative to piglets with normal preweaning growth.

Authors:  Timothy G Ramsay; Margo J Stoll; Amy E Shannon; Le Ann Blomberg
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-04-26

10.  Post-weaning and whole-of-life performance of pigs is determined by live weight at weaning and the complexity of the diet fed after weaning.

Authors:  Cherie L Collins; John R Pluske; Rebecca S Morrison; Trevor N McDonald; Robert J Smits; David J Henman; Ingunn Stensland; Frank R Dunshea
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2017-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.