Literature DB >> 27129397

Reproductive performance of "nurse sows" in Danish piggeries.

T S Bruun1, C Amdi2, J Vinther3, M Schop3, A B Strathe4, C F Hansen2.   

Abstract

The use of nurse sows in Danish piggeries is common practice because of large litter sizes; however, the effect of being selected as a nurse sow on subsequent reproductive performance is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify a nurse sow's reproductive performance in the subsequent litter. Nurse sows were defined as sows weaning their own litter at least 18 days postpartum and thereafter nursing another litter (nurse litter) before service. Data (2012-2013) from 20 piggeries with more than 14.5 live born piglets per litter and a stable distribution of sows among parities over time were selected. Records from 79,864 litters were obtained and analyzed using mixed linear and logistic regression models. The average lactation lengths were 40.3 days for nurse sows and 27.8 days for non-nurse (normal) sows. Nurse sows weaned on average 12.4 piglets and subsequently 11.5 nurse piglets, whereas non-nurse weaned 11.7 piglets in their single weaning. There was no difference in re-service rate between nurse and non-nurse sows in the subsequent reproductive cycle. Subsequent litter size in the next reproductive cycle was higher for nurse sows than that for non-nurse sows (18.69 vs. 18.11 total born piglets; P < 0.001). Nurse sows were of a slightly lower parity than non-nurse sows (3.12 vs. 3.27, P < 0.001), and nurse sows had an increased weaning to estrus interval compared to non-nurse sows (4.23 vs. 4.19 days, P < 0.001). The results indicate that nurse sows were selected among sows nursing large litters and could therefore suggest that these sows represent the best percentile of sows in a given piggery. In conclusion, this survey indicated no negative effects of being selected as a nurse sow on the subsequent reproductive performance. On the contrary, nurse sows gave birth to more piglets compared to non-nurse sows in their subsequent litter.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Lactation length; Nurse sows; Subsequent reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27129397     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  7 in total

1.  Dietary supplement rich in fiber fed to late gestating sows during transition reduces rate of stillborn piglets.

Authors:  T Feyera; C K Højgaard; J Vinther; T S Bruun; P K Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Factors for improving reproductive performance of sows and herd productivity in commercial breeding herds.

Authors:  Yuzo Koketsu; Satomi Tani; Ryosuke Iida
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2017-01-09

3.  The effect of double nursing, an alternative nursing strategy for the hyper-prolific sow herd, on herd performance.

Authors:  Manon A M Houben; Tijs J Tobias; Manon M C Holstege
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2017-02-16

Review 4.  A Review of Success Factors for Piglet Fostering in Lactation.

Authors:  Jena G Alexopoulos; David S Lines; Suzanne Hallett; Kate J Plush
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Identifying challenges to manage body weight variation in pig farms implementing all-in-all-out management practices and their possible implications for animal health: a case study.

Authors:  Maria Rodrigues da Costa; Edgar García Manzanilla; Alessia Diana; Nienke van Staaveren; Alberto Torres-Pitarch; Laura Ann Boyle; Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-01-11

6.  Animal Welfare and Economic Aspects of Using Nurse Sows in Swedish Pig Production.

Authors:  Karin Alvåsen; Helena Hansson; Ulf Emanuelson; Rebecka Westin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-01

7.  The Stomach Capacity is Reduced in Intrauterine Growth Restricted Piglets Compared to Normal Piglets.

Authors:  Julie C Lynegaard; Janni Hales; Marlene N Nielsen; Christian F Hansen; Charlotte Amdi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.