Patricia G Wolf1,2,3,4,5, Saravanan Devendran3,5,6, Heidi L Doden3,5, Lindsey K Ly3,4,5, Tyler Moore7, Hajime Takei8, Hiroshi Nittono8, Tsuyoshi Murai9, Takao Kurosawa9, George E Chlipala10, Stefan J Green10, Genta Kakiyama11, Purna Kashyap12, Vance J McCracken13, H Rex Gaskins3,4,5,14,15, Patrick M Gillevet6, Jason M Ridlon16,17,18,19,20. 1. Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. Cancer Education and Career Development Program, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. 4. Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. 5. Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. 6. Structural and Computational Biology Research Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelburg, Germany. 7. Center for Microbiome Analysis, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA. 8. Junshin Clinic Bile Acid Institute, Meguro-Ku, Tokyo, 152-0011, Japan. 9. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Tobetsu, Japan. 10. University of Illinois Chicago Research Resources Center, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 11. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. 12. Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 13. Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL, USA. 14. Department of Pathobiology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. 15. Cancer Center of Illinois, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. 16. Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. jmridlon@illinois.edu. 17. Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. jmridlon@illinois.edu. 18. Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. jmridlon@illinois.edu. 19. Cancer Center of Illinois, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. jmridlon@illinois.edu. 20. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. jmridlon@illinois.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Berberine (BBR) is a plant-based nutraceutical that has been used for millennia to treat diarrheal infections and in contemporary medicine to improve patient lipid profiles. Reduction in lipids, particularly cholesterol, is achieved partly through up-regulation of bile acid synthesis and excretion into the gastrointestinal tract (GI). The efficacy of BBR is also thought to be dependent on structural and functional alterations of the gut microbiome. However, knowledge of the effects of BBR on gut microbiome communities is currently lacking. Distinguishing indirect effects of BBR on bacteria through altered bile acid profiles is particularly important in understanding how dietary nutraceuticals alter the microbiome. RESULTS: Germfree mice were colonized with a defined minimal gut bacterial consortium capable of functional bile acid metabolism (Bacteroides vulgatus, Bacteroides uniformis, Parabacteroides distasonis, Bilophila wadsworthia, Clostridium hylemonae, Clostridium hiranonis, Blautia producta; B4PC2). Multi-omics (bile acid metabolomics, 16S rDNA sequencing, cecal metatranscriptomics) were performed in order to provide a simple in vivo model from which to identify network-based correlations between bile acids and bacterial transcripts in the presence and absence of dietary BBR. Significant alterations in network topology and connectivity in function were observed, despite similarity in gut microbial alpha diversity (P = 0.30) and beta-diversity (P = 0.123) between control and BBR treatment. BBR increased cecal bile acid concentrations, (P < 0.05), most notably deoxycholic acid (DCA) (P < 0.001). Overall, analysis of transcriptomes and correlation networks indicates both bacterial species-specific responses to BBR, as well as functional commonalities among species, such as up-regulation of Na+/H+ antiporter, cell wall synthesis/repair, carbohydrate metabolism and amino acid metabolism. Bile acid concentrations in the GI tract increased significantly during BBR treatment and developed extensive correlation networks with expressed genes in the B4PC2 community. CONCLUSIONS: This work has important implications for interpreting the effects of BBR on structure and function of the complex gut microbiome, which may lead to targeted pharmaceutical interventions aimed to achieve the positive physiological effects previously observed with BBR supplementation.
BACKGROUND:Berberine (BBR) is a plant-based nutraceutical that has been used for millennia to treat diarrheal infections and in contemporary medicine to improve patientlipid profiles. Reduction in lipids, particularly cholesterol, is achieved partly through up-regulation of bile acid synthesis and excretion into the gastrointestinal tract (GI). The efficacy of BBR is also thought to be dependent on structural and functional alterations of the gut microbiome. However, knowledge of the effects of BBR on gut microbiome communities is currently lacking. Distinguishing indirect effects of BBR on bacteria through altered bile acid profiles is particularly important in understanding how dietary nutraceuticals alter the microbiome. RESULTS: Germfree mice were colonized with a defined minimal gut bacterial consortium capable of functional bile acid metabolism (Bacteroides vulgatus, Bacteroides uniformis, Parabacteroides distasonis, Bilophila wadsworthia, Clostridium hylemonae, Clostridium hiranonis, Blautia producta; B4PC2). Multi-omics (bile acid metabolomics, 16S rDNA sequencing, cecal metatranscriptomics) were performed in order to provide a simple in vivo model from which to identify network-based correlations between bile acids and bacterial transcripts in the presence and absence of dietary BBR. Significant alterations in network topology and connectivity in function were observed, despite similarity in gut microbial alpha diversity (P = 0.30) and beta-diversity (P = 0.123) between control and BBR treatment. BBR increased cecal bile acid concentrations, (P < 0.05), most notably deoxycholic acid (DCA) (P < 0.001). Overall, analysis of transcriptomes and correlation networks indicates both bacterial species-specific responses to BBR, as well as functional commonalities among species, such as up-regulation of Na+/H+ antiporter, cell wall synthesis/repair, carbohydrate metabolism and amino acid metabolism. Bile acid concentrations in the GI tract increased significantly during BBR treatment and developed extensive correlation networks with expressed genes in the B4PC2 community. CONCLUSIONS: This work has important implications for interpreting the effects of BBR on structure and function of the complex gut microbiome, which may lead to targeted pharmaceutical interventions aimed to achieve the positive physiological effects previously observed with BBR supplementation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Berberine; Bile acids; Gnotobiotic mice; Gut bacteria; Network analysis; Nutraceutical; RNA-Seq
Authors: Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker Journal: Genome Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Phillip B Hylemon; Huiping Zhou; William M Pandak; Shunlin Ren; Gregorio Gil; Paul Dent Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2009-04-03 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Takeshi Inagaki; Antonio Moschetta; Youn-Kyoung Lee; Li Peng; Guixiang Zhao; Michael Downes; Ruth T Yu; John M Shelton; James A Richardson; Joyce J Repa; David J Mangelsdorf; Steven A Kliewer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-02-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J Gregory Caporaso; Justin Kuczynski; Jesse Stombaugh; Kyle Bittinger; Frederic D Bushman; Elizabeth K Costello; Noah Fierer; Antonio Gonzalez Peña; Julia K Goodrich; Jeffrey I Gordon; Gavin A Huttley; Scott T Kelley; Dan Knights; Jeremy E Koenig; Ruth E Ley; Catherine A Lozupone; Daniel McDonald; Brian D Muegge; Meg Pirrung; Jens Reeder; Joel R Sevinsky; Peter J Turnbaugh; William A Walters; Jeremy Widmann; Tanya Yatsunenko; Jesse Zaneveld; Rob Knight Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2010-04-11 Impact factor: 28.547