Literature DB >> 33423324

Dynamic Transcriptional and Epigenetic Changes Drive Cellular Plasticity in the Liver.

Allyson J Merrell1, Tao Peng2, Jinyang Li1, Kathryn Sun1,3, Bin Li4, Takeshi Katsuda1, Markus Grompe4, Kai Tan2,5,6, Ben Z Stanger1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Following liver injury, a fraction of hepatocytes adopt features of biliary epithelial cells (BECs) in a process known as biliary reprogramming. The aim of this study was to elucidate the molecular events accompanying this dramatic shift in cellular identity. APPROACH AND
RESULTS: We applied the techniques of bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), single-cell RNA-seq, and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing to define the epigenetic and transcriptional changes associated with biliary reprogramming. In addition, we examined the role of TGF-β signaling by profiling cells undergoing reprogramming in mice with hepatocyte-specific deletion in the downstream TGF-β signaling component mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (Smad4). Biliary reprogramming followed a stereotyped pattern of altered gene expression consisting of robust induction of biliary genes and weaker repression of hepatocyte genes. These changes in gene expression were accompanied by corresponding modifications at the chromatin level. Although some reprogrammed cells had molecular features of "fully differentiated" BECs, most lacked some biliary characteristics and retained some hepatocyte characteristics. Surprisingly, single-cell analysis of Smad4 mutant mice revealed a dramatic increase in reprogramming.
CONCLUSION: Hepatocytes undergo widespread chromatin and transcriptional changes during biliary reprogramming, resulting in epigenetic and gene expression profiles that are similar to, but distinct from, native BECs. Reprogramming involves a progressive accumulation of biliary molecular features without discrete intermediates. Paradoxically, canonical TGF-β signaling through Smad4 appears to constrain biliary reprogramming, indicating that TGF-β can either promote or inhibit biliary differentiation depending on which downstream components of the pathway are engaged. This work has implications for the formation of BECs and bile ducts in the adult liver.
© 2021 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33423324      PMCID: PMC8271088          DOI: 10.1002/hep.31704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.298


  42 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms of liver and bile duct development.

Authors:  Yiwei Zong; Ben Z Stanger
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 5.814

2.  Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into neural stem cells by defined factors.

Authors:  Dong Wook Han; Natalia Tapia; Andreas Hermann; Kathrin Hemmer; Susanne Höing; Marcos J Araúzo-Bravo; Holm Zaehres; Guangming Wu; Stefan Frank; Sören Moritz; Boris Greber; Ji Hun Yang; Hoon Taek Lee; Jens C Schwamborn; Alexander Storch; Hans R Schöler
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 3.  Advances in liver regeneration.

Authors:  George K Michalopoulos
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 4.  Stem cell plasticity. Plasticity of epithelial stem cells in tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Cédric Blanpain; Elaine Fuchs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Hippo pathway activity influences liver cell fate.

Authors:  Dean Yimlamai; Constantina Christodoulou; Giorgio G Galli; Kilangsungla Yanger; Brian Pepe-Mooney; Basanta Gurung; Kriti Shrestha; Patrick Cahan; Ben Z Stanger; Fernando D Camargo
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The Hippo signaling functions through the Notch signaling to regulate intrahepatic bile duct development in mammals.

Authors:  Nan Wu; Quy Nguyen; Ying Wan; Tiaohao Zhou; Julie Venter; Gabriel A Frampton; Sharon DeMorrow; Duojia Pan; Fanyin Meng; Shannon Glaser; Gianfranco Alpini; Haibo Bai
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.662

7.  A single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals precise pathways and regulatory mechanisms underlying hepatoblast differentiation.

Authors:  Li Yang; Wei-Hua Wang; Wei-Lin Qiu; Zhen Guo; Erfei Bi; Cheng-Ran Xu
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  A Homeostatic Arid1a-Dependent Permissive Chromatin State Licenses Hepatocyte Responsiveness to Liver-Injury-Associated YAP Signaling.

Authors:  Weiping Li; Liguang Yang; Qiang He; Chaobo Hu; Linying Zhu; Xiaolong Ma; Xueyan Ma; Shujie Bao; Lu Li; Yingying Chen; Xing Deng; Xin Zhang; Jin Cen; Lei Zhang; Zhong Wang; Wei-Fen Xie; Hong Li; Yixue Li; Lijian Hui
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 24.633

9.  Tumor necrosis factor-α promotes bile ductular transdifferentiation of mature rat hepatocytes in vitro.

Authors:  Yuji Nishikawa; Masayuki Sone; Yasuharu Nagahama; Eriko Kumagai; Yuko Doi; Yasufumi Omori; Toshiaki Yoshioka; Takuo Tokairin; Masayuki Yoshida; Yohei Yamamoto; Akihiko Ito; Toshihiro Sugiyama; Katsuhiko Enomoto
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 10.  Non-Smad pathways in TGF-beta signaling.

Authors:  Ying E Zhang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 25.617

View more
  1 in total

1.  Characteristics of SOX9-positive progenitor-like cells during cholestatic liver regeneration in biliary atresia.

Authors:  Yuting Lin; Fang Zhang; Ludi Zhang; Lian Chen; Shan Zheng
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 6.832

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.