Li Yang1,2, Wei-Hua Wang1,2, Wei-Lin Qiu1,3, Zhen Guo1, Erfei Bi4, Cheng-Ran Xu1. 1. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, College of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China. 2. Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China. 3. PKU-Tsinghua-NIBS Graduate Program, Peking University, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
How bipotential hepatoblasts differentiate into hepatocytes and cholangiocytes remains unclear. Here, using single-cell transcriptomic analysis of hepatoblasts, hepatocytes, and cholangiocytes sorted from embryonic day 10.5 (E10.5) to E17.5 mouse embryos, we found that hepatoblast-to-hepatocyte differentiation occurred gradually and followed a linear default pathway. As more cells became fully differentiated hepatocytes, the number of proliferating cells decreased. Surprisingly, proliferating and quiescent hepatoblasts exhibited homogeneous differentiation states at a given developmental stage. This unique feature enabled us to combine single-cell and bulk-cell analyses to define the precise timing of the hepatoblast-to-hepatocyte transition, which occurs between E13.5 and E15.5. In contrast to hepatocyte development at almost all levels, hepatoblast-to-cholangiocyte differentiation underwent a sharp detour from the default pathway. New cholangiocyte generation occurred continuously between E11.5 and E14.5, but their maturation states at a given developmental stage were heterogeneous. Even more surprising, the number of proliferating cells increased as more progenitor cells differentiated into mature cholangiocytes. Based on an observation from the single-cell analysis, we also discovered that the protein kinase C/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway promoted cholangiocyte maturation. CONCLUSION: Our studies have defined distinct pathways for hepatocyte and cholangiocyte development in vivo, which are critically important for understanding basic liver biology and developing effective strategies to induce stem cells to differentiate toward specific hepatic cell fates in vitro. (Hepatology 2017;66:1387-1401).
How bipotential hepatoblasts differentiate into hepatocytes and cholangiocytes remains unclear. Here, using single-cell transcriptomic analysis of hepatoblasts, hepatocytes, and cholangiocytes sorted from embryonic day 10.5 (E10.5) to E17.5 mouse embryos, we found that hepatoblast-to-hepatocyte differentiation occurred gradually and followed a linear default pathway. As more cells became fully differentiated hepatocytes, the number of proliferating cells decreased. Surprisingly, proliferating and quiescent hepatoblasts exhibited homogeneous differentiation states at a given developmental stage. This unique feature enabled us to combine single-cell and bulk-cell analyses to define the precise timing of the hepatoblast-to-hepatocyte transition, which occurs between E13.5 and E15.5. In contrast to hepatocyte development at almost all levels, hepatoblast-to-cholangiocyte differentiation underwent a sharp detour from the default pathway. New cholangiocyte generation occurred continuously between E11.5 and E14.5, but their maturation states at a given developmental stage were heterogeneous. Even more surprising, the number of proliferating cells increased as more progenitor cells differentiated into mature cholangiocytes. Based on an observation from the single-cell analysis, we also discovered that the protein kinase C/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway promoted cholangiocyte maturation. CONCLUSION: Our studies have defined distinct pathways for hepatocyte and cholangiocyte development in vivo, which are critically important for understanding basic liver biology and developing effective strategies to induce stem cells to differentiate toward specific hepatic cell fates in vitro. (Hepatology 2017;66:1387-1401).
Authors: John J Welch; Jason A Watts; Christopher R Vakoc; Yu Yao; Hao Wang; Ross C Hardison; Gerd A Blobel; Lewis A Chodosh; Mitchell J Weiss Journal: Blood Date: 2004-08-05 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Shuibing Chen; Malgorzata Borowiak; Julia L Fox; René Maehr; Kenji Osafune; Lance Davidow; Kelvin Lam; Lee F Peng; Stuart L Schreiber; Lee L Rubin; Douglas Melton Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2009-03-15 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Shuping Yang; Ming Ji; Lin Zhang; Yuanhong Chen; Dirk Oliver Wennmann; Joachim Kremerskothen; Jixin Dong Journal: Cell Signal Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 4.315
Authors: Jan S Tchorz; Jochen Kinter; Matthias Müller; Luigi Tornillo; Markus H Heim; Bernhard Bettler Journal: Hepatology Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Yingxin Lin; Shila Ghazanfar; Kevin Y X Wang; Johann A Gagnon-Bartsch; Kitty K Lo; Xianbin Su; Ze-Guang Han; John T Ormerod; Terence P Speed; Pengyi Yang; Jean Yee Hwa Yang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-04-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gabriel K El Sebae; Joseph M Malatos; Mary-Kate E Cone; Siyeon Rhee; Jesse R Angelo; Jesse Mager; Kimberly D Tremblay Journal: Development Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: John C Marioni; Jean Yee Hwa Yang; Shila Ghazanfar; Yingxin Lin; Xianbin Su; David Ming Lin; Ellis Patrick; Ze-Guang Han Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Nicole Prior; Christopher J Hindley; Fabian Rost; Elena Meléndez; Winnie W Y Lau; Berthold Göttgens; Steffen Rulands; Benjamin D Simons; Meritxell Huch Journal: Development Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Luigi Aloia; Mikel Alexander McKie; Grégoire Vernaz; Lucía Cordero-Espinoza; Niya Aleksieva; Jelle van den Ameele; Francesco Antonica; Berta Font-Cunill; Alexander Raven; Riccardo Aiese Cigliano; German Belenguer; Richard L Mort; Andrea H Brand; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz; Stuart J Forbes; Eric A Miska; Meritxell Huch Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 28.824