Literature DB >> 3342218

Contrast sensitivity and acuity relationship in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia.

M Abrahamsson1, J Sjöstrand.   

Abstract

The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) and visual acuity were determined in children and adults with unilateral amblyopia due to strabismus or anisometropia with central fixation. The preschool children were examined repeatedly during occlusion treatment. All amblyopes had CSF deficits. The CSF was characterised by its peak value (the maximal sensitivity, Smax, and the spatial frequency at which Smax occurs, Frmax) calculated by a single peak least-square regression method. The two amblyopic groups showed discrepancies in relationship of both Smax and Frmax versus visual acuity both initially and during treatment. The strabismic cases had a more marked visual acuity deficit in relation to the contrast sensitivity losses, whereas these parameters are affected similarly in anisometropic amblyopes. The relationship between recovery of visual acuity and CSF during the initial month of occlusion treatment was of prognostic significance for the outcome of visual acuity improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3342218      PMCID: PMC1041365          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.72.1.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  17 in total

1.  A study of separation difficulty. Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes.

Authors:  J A STUART; H M BURIAN
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Development of the neural basis of visual acuity in monkeys: speculation on the origin of deprivation amblyopia.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F Vital-Durand
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1979

3.  Monocular spatial distortion in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  H D Bedell; M C Flom
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Differences in vernier discrimination for grating between strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes.

Authors:  D M Levi; S Klein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopias: the effect of mean luminance.

Authors:  R F Hess; F W Campbell; R Zimmern
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Experimental amblyopia in monkeys. II. Behavioral studies in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  G K Von Noorden; J E Dowling
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-08

7.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: evidence for a two type classification.

Authors:  R F Hess; E R Howell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Suprathreshold spatial frequency detection and binocular interaction in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  D M Levi; R S Harwerth; R E Manny
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Contrast perception above threshold is only minimally impaired in human amblyopia.

Authors:  R F Hess; A Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-10-02       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Contrast sensitivity in children with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. A study of the effect of treatment.

Authors:  J Sjöstrand
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1981-02
View more
  14 in total

1.  Efficacy of occlusion for strabismic amblyopia: can an optimal duration be identified?

Authors:  M Cleary
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Monocular activation of V1 and V2 in amblyopic adults measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ian P Conner; J Vernon Odom; Terry L Schwartz; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Contrast sensitivity in 10 year old preterm and full term children: a population based study.

Authors:  E Larsson; A Rydberg; G Holmström
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Movement hyperacuity in childhood amblyopia.

Authors:  S L Kelly; T J Buckingham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Differential Experience-Dependent Plasticity of Form and Motion Mechanisms in Anisometropic Amblyopia.

Authors:  Sean I Chen; Arvind Chandna; Spero Nicholas; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Contrast sensitivity after extracapsular and intracapsular cataract extraction.

Authors:  E K Mela; J X Koliopoulos; N M Pharmakakis; S P Gartaganis
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 7.  Amblyopia: a mini review of the literature.

Authors:  Evgenia Kanonidou
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  The use of the scanning laser ophthalmoscope in the evaluation of amblyopia (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  David A Johnson
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

9.  Alterations in audiovisual simultaneity perception in amblyopia.

Authors:  Michael D Richards; Herbert C Goltz; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fluoxetine does not enhance the effect of perceptual learning on visual function in adults with amblyopia.

Authors:  Henri J Huttunen; J Matias Palva; Laura Lindberg; Satu Palva; Ville Saarela; Elina Karvonen; Marja-Leena Latvala; Johanna Liinamaa; Sigrid Booms; Eero Castrén; Hannu Uusitalo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.