Renato M Passos1,2, Fernando K Malerbi1,2, Marindia Rocha3, Maurício Maia1, Michel E Farah1. 1. Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP/EPM), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil. 2. Instituto da Visão (IPEPO), Rua Borges Lagoa 1083, São Paulo, SP, 04038-032, Brazil. 3. Instituto da Visão (IPEPO), Rua Borges Lagoa 1083, São Paulo, SP, 04038-032, Brazil. marindiaroch@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of visual impairment and its treatment is a public health challenge. Even though anti-angiogenic drugs are the gold-standard treatment, they are not ideal and subthreshold laser (SL) remains a viable and promising therapy in selected cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate its efficacy in a real-life setting. METHODS: Retrospective case series of 56 eyes of 36 patients with center-involving DME treated with SL monotherapy. Treatment was performed in a single session with the EasyRet® photocoagulator with the following parameters: 5% duty cycle, 200-ms pulse duration, 160-µm spot size and 50% power of the barely visible threshold. A high-density pattern was then applied to the whole edematous area, using multispot mode. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) data were obtained at baseline and around 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-six eyes of 36 patients were included (39% women, mean age 64.8 years old); mean time between treatment day and follow-up visit was 14 ± 6 weeks. BCVA (Snellen converted to logMAR) was 0.59 ± 0.32 and 0.43 ± 0.25 at baseline and follow-up, respectively (p = 0.002). Thirty-two percent had prior panretinal photocoagulation (p = 0.011). Mean laser power was 555 ± 150 mW and number of spots was 1,109 ± 580. Intraretinal and subretinal fluid (SRF) was seen in 96 and 41% of eyes at baseline and improved in 35 and 74% of those after treatment, respectively. Quantitative analysis of central macular thickness (CMT) change was performed in a subset of 23 eyes, 43% of which exhibited > 10% CMT reduction post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Subthreshold laser therapy is known to have RPE function as its main target, modulating the activation of heat-shock proteins and normalizing cytokine expression. In the present study, the DME cases associated with SRF had the best anatomical response, while intraretinal edema responded poorly to laser monotherapy. BCVA and macular thickness exhibited a mild response, suggesting the need for combined treatment in most patients. Given the effect on SRF reabsorption, subthreshold laser therapy could be a viable treatment option in selected cases.
BACKGROUND:Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of visual impairment and its treatment is a public health challenge. Even though anti-angiogenic drugs are the gold-standard treatment, they are not ideal and subthreshold laser (SL) remains a viable and promising therapy in selected cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate its efficacy in a real-life setting. METHODS: Retrospective case series of 56 eyes of 36 patients with center-involving DME treated with SL monotherapy. Treatment was performed in a single session with the EasyRet® photocoagulator with the following parameters: 5% duty cycle, 200-ms pulse duration, 160-µm spot size and 50% power of the barely visible threshold. A high-density pattern was then applied to the whole edematous area, using multispot mode. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) data were obtained at baseline and around 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-six eyes of 36 patients were included (39% women, mean age 64.8 years old); mean time between treatment day and follow-up visit was 14 ± 6 weeks. BCVA (Snellen converted to logMAR) was 0.59 ± 0.32 and 0.43 ± 0.25 at baseline and follow-up, respectively (p = 0.002). Thirty-two percent had prior panretinal photocoagulation (p = 0.011). Mean laser power was 555 ± 150 mW and number of spots was 1,109 ± 580. Intraretinal and subretinal fluid (SRF) was seen in 96 and 41% of eyes at baseline and improved in 35 and 74% of those after treatment, respectively. Quantitative analysis of central macular thickness (CMT) change was performed in a subset of 23 eyes, 43% of which exhibited > 10% CMT reduction post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Subthreshold laser therapy is known to have RPE function as its main target, modulating the activation of heat-shock proteins and normalizing cytokine expression. In the present study, the DME cases associated with SRF had the best anatomical response, while intraretinal edema responded poorly to laser monotherapy. BCVA and macular thickness exhibited a mild response, suggesting the need for combined treatment in most patients. Given the effect on SRF reabsorption, subthreshold laser therapy could be a viable treatment option in selected cases.
Authors: Michael J Elman; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Roy W Beck; Neil M Bressler; Susan B Bressler; Allison R Edwards; Frederick L Ferris; Scott M Friedman; Adam R Glassman; Kellee M Miller; Ingrid U Scott; Cynthia R Stockdale; Jennifer K Sun Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Daniel Lavinsky; Jose A Cardillo; Luiz A S Melo; Alessandro Dare; Michel E Farah; Rubens Belfort Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-06-17 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Quan Dong Nguyen; David M Brown; Dennis M Marcus; David S Boyer; Sunil Patel; Leonard Feiner; Andrea Gibson; Judy Sy; Amy Chen Rundle; J Jill Hopkins; Roman G Rubio; Jason S Ehrlich Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-02-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jean-François Korobelnik; Diana V Do; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; David S Boyer; Frank G Holz; Jeffrey S Heier; Edoardo Midena; Peter K Kaiser; Hiroko Terasaki; Dennis M Marcus; Quan D Nguyen; Glenn J Jaffe; Jason S Slakter; Christian Simader; Yuhwen Soo; Thomas Schmelter; George D Yancopoulos; Neil Stahl; Robert Vitti; Alyson J Berliner; Oliver Zeitz; Carola Metzig; David M Brown Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Tien Y Wong; Jennifer Sun; Ryo Kawasaki; Paisan Ruamviboonsuk; Neeru Gupta; Van Charles Lansingh; Mauricio Maia; Wanjiku Mathenge; Sunil Moreker; Mahi M K Muqit; Serge Resnikoff; Juan Verdaguer; Peiquan Zhao; Frederick Ferris; Lloyd P Aiello; Hugh R Taylor Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Eric L Ross; David W Hutton; Joshua D Stein; Neil M Bressler; Lee M Jampol; Adam R Glassman Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Ann S Wilson; Bridget G Hobbs; Wei-Yong Shen; Terence P Speed; Uli Schmidt; C Glenn Begley; P Elizabeth Rakoczy Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.799