Literature DB >> 25012934

Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema.

Jean-François Korobelnik1, Diana V Do2, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth3, David S Boyer4, Frank G Holz5, Jeffrey S Heier6, Edoardo Midena7, Peter K Kaiser8, Hiroko Terasaki9, Dennis M Marcus10, Quan D Nguyen2, Glenn J Jaffe11, Jason S Slakter12, Christian Simader3, Yuhwen Soo13, Thomas Schmelter14, George D Yancopoulos13, Neil Stahl13, Robert Vitti13, Alyson J Berliner13, Oliver Zeitz15, Carola Metzig14, David M Brown16.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A head-to-head comparison was performed between vascular endothelial growth factor blockade and laser for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).
DESIGN: Two similarly designed, double-masked, randomized, phase 3 trials, VISTA(DME) and VIVID(DME). PARTICIPANTS: We included 872 patients (eyes) with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus who presented with DME with central involvement.
METHODS: Eyes received either intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints at week 52 included the proportion of eyes that gained ≥ 15 letters from baseline and the mean change from baseline in central retinal thickness as determined by optical coherence tomography.
RESULTS: Mean BCVA gains from baseline to week 52 in the IAI 2q4 and 2q8 groups versus the laser group were 12.5 and 10.7 versus 0.2 letters (P < 0.0001) in VISTA, and 10.5 and 10.7 versus 1.2 letters (P < 0.0001) in VIVID. The corresponding proportions of eyes gaining ≥ 15 letters were 41.6% and 31.1% versus 7.8% (P < 0.0001) in VISTA, and 32.4% and 33.3% versus 9.1% (P < 0.0001) in VIVID. Similarly, mean reductions in central retinal thickness were 185.9 and 183.1 versus 73.3 μm (P < 0.0001) in VISTA, and 195.0 and 192.4 versus 66.2 μm (P < 0.0001) in VIVID. Overall incidences of ocular and nonocular adverse events and serious adverse events, including the Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration-defined arterial thromboembolic events and vascular deaths, were similar across treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: At week 52, IAI demonstrated significant superiority in functional and anatomic endpoints over laser, with similar efficacy in the 2q4 and 2q8 groups despite the extended dosing interval in the 2q8 group. In general, IAI was well-tolerated.
Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25012934     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  210 in total

1.  Panretinal Photocoagulation vs Intravitreous Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Gross; Adam R Glassman; Lee M Jampol; Seidu Inusah; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Andrew N Antoszyk; Carl W Baker; Brian B Berger; Neil M Bressler; David Browning; Michael J Elman; Frederick L Ferris; Scott M Friedman; Dennis M Marcus; Michele Melia; Cynthia R Stockdale; Jennifer K Sun; Roy W Beck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  [National guidelines for treatment of diabetic retinopathy : Second edition of the national guidelines for treatment of diabetic retinopathy].

Authors:  F Ziemssen; K Lemmen; B Bertram; H P Hammes; H Agostini
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Future opportunities in diabetic retinopathy research.

Authors:  Thomas W Gardner; Emily Y Chew
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 4.  [Diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of diabetic eye control].

Authors:  Stephan Radda; Matthias Bolz; Stefan Egger; Vanessa Gasser-Steiner; Martina Kralinger; Stefan Mennel; Christoph Scholda; Ulrike Stolba; Andreas Wedrich; Katharina Krepler
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 5.  Management of diabetic macular edema in Japan: a review and expert opinion.

Authors:  Hiroko Terasaki; Yuichiro Ogura; Shigehiko Kitano; Taiji Sakamoto; Toshinori Murata; Akito Hirakata; Tatsuro Ishibashi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacology of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs.

Authors:  Stefano Fogli; Marzia Del Re; Eleonora Rofi; Chiara Posarelli; Michele Figus; Romano Danesi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Diabetic Retinopathy: Focus on Minority Populations.

Authors:  Arpine Barsegian; Boleslav Kotlyar; Justin Lee; Moro O Salifu; Samy I McFarlane
Journal:  Int J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-11-11

8.  Optical Coherence Tomography Features in Diabetic Macular Edema and the Impact on Anti-VEGF Response.

Authors:  Yuji Itoh; Daniel Petkovsek; Peter K Kaiser; Rishi P Singh; Justis P Ehlers
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.300

Review 9.  Recent perspectives on the delivery of biologics to back of the eye.

Authors:  Mary Joseph; Hoang M Trinh; Kishore Cholkar; Dhananjay Pal; Ashim K Mitra
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 10.  Treatment of diabetic retinopathy: Recent advances and unresolved challenges.

Authors:  Michael W Stewart
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2016-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.