Literature DB >> 22330964

Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE.

Quan Dong Nguyen1, David M Brown, Dennis M Marcus, David S Boyer, Sunil Patel, Leonard Feiner, Andrea Gibson, Judy Sy, Amy Chen Rundle, J Jill Hopkins, Roman G Rubio, Jason S Ehrlich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients.
DESIGN: Two parallel, methodologically identical, phase III, multicenter, double-masked, sham injection-controlled, randomized studies. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with vision loss from DME (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], 20/40-20/320 Snellen equivalent) and central subfield thickness ≥275 μm on time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). INTERVENTION: Monthly intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5 or 0.3 mg) or sham injections. Macular laser was available per-protocol-specified criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients gaining ≥15 letters in BCVA from baseline at 24 months.
RESULTS: In RISE (NCT00473330), 377 patients were randomized (127 to sham, 125 to 0.3 mg, 125 to 0.5 mg). At 24 months, 18.1% of sham patients gained ≥15 letters versus 44.8% of 0.3-mg (P<0.0001; difference vs sham adjusted for randomization stratification factors, 24.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.8-34.8) and 39.2% of 0.5-mg ranibizumab patients (P<0.001; adjusted difference, 20.9%; 95% CI, 10.7-31.1). In RIDE (NCT00473382), 382 patients were randomized (130 to sham, 125 to 0.3 mg, 127 to 0.5 mg). Significantly more ranibizumab-treated patients gained ≥15 letters: 12.3% of sham patients versus 33.6% of 0.3-mg patients (P<0.0001; adjusted difference, 20.8%; 95% CI, 11.4-30.2) and 45.7% of 0.5-mg ranibizumab patients (P<0.0001; adjusted difference, 33.3%; 95% CI, 23.8-42.8). Significant improvements in macular edema were noted on OCT, and retinopathy was less likely to worsen and more likely to improve in ranibizumab-treated patients. Ranibizumab-treated patients underwent significantly fewer macular laser procedures (mean of 1.8 and 1.6 laser procedures over 24 months in the sham groups vs 0.3-0.8 in ranibizumab groups). Ocular safety was consistent with prior ranibizumab studies; endophthalmitis occurred in 4 ranibizumab patients. The total incidence of deaths from vascular or unknown causes, nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and nonfatal cerebrovascular accidents, which are possible effects from systemic vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition, was 4.9% to 5.5% of sham patients and 2.4% to 8.8% of ranibizumab patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab rapidly and sustainably improved vision, reduced the risk of further vision loss, and improved macular edema in patients with DME, with low rates of ocular and nonocular harm.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22330964     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  484 in total

1.  The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) Is One of the Effectors by Which Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)/Anti-VEGF Controls the Endothelial Cell Barrier.

Authors:  Yueru Li; Zhonghao Yan; Komal Chaudhry; Andrius Kazlauskas
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Sustained-release steroids for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Alejandra Daruich; Alexandre Matet; Francine Behar-Cohen
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  Management of diabetic macular edema in Japan: a review and expert opinion.

Authors:  Hiroko Terasaki; Yuichiro Ogura; Shigehiko Kitano; Taiji Sakamoto; Toshinori Murata; Akito Hirakata; Tatsuro Ishibashi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  David S Boyer; J Jill Hopkins; Jonathan Sorof; Jason S Ehrlich
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacology of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs.

Authors:  Stefano Fogli; Marzia Del Re; Eleonora Rofi; Chiara Posarelli; Michele Figus; Romano Danesi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Running on Trk to neuroprotection in diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Rithwick Rajagopal
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Anti-VEGF versus dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) for the management of Centre involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CiDME): a randomized study.

Authors:  Ashish Sharma; Keerthi Bellala; Pankaj Dongre; Prahalad Reddy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Adipose-derived stem cells from diabetic mice show impaired vascular stabilization in a murine model of diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Stephen M Cronk; Molly R Kelly-Goss; H Clifton Ray; Thomas A Mendel; Kyle L Hoehn; Anthony C Bruce; Bijan K Dey; Alexander M Guendel; Daniel N Tavakol; Ira M Herman; Shayn M Peirce; Paul A Yates
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 9.  Recent perspectives on the delivery of biologics to back of the eye.

Authors:  Mary Joseph; Hoang M Trinh; Kishore Cholkar; Dhananjay Pal; Ashim K Mitra
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 6.648

10.  Early Response to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Two-Year Outcomes Among Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema in Protocol T.

Authors:  Neil M Bressler; Wesley T Beaulieu; Maureen G Maguire; Adam R Glassman; Kevin J Blinder; Susan B Bressler; Victor H Gonzalez; Lee M Jampol; Michele Melia; Jennifer K Sun; John A Wells
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 5.258

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.