Literature DB >> 33420595

Triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancers found by mammography screening show excellent prognosis.

Johanna Alanko1, Minna Tanner2, Ritva Vanninen3, Anssi Auvinen4, Jorma Isola5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to explore the prognosis of aggressive breast cancers of the HER2 oncogene amplification (HER2 +) and triple-negative (TN) subtypes detected by screening, as well as the prognosis of interval cancers (clinically due to symptoms between screening rounds) and cancers in screening nonparticipants.
METHODS: The study population comprised of 823 breast cancers in women aged 50-69 years from 2006-2014. Of these, 572 were found by screening mammography (69%), 170 were diagnosed between the screening rounds (21%), and 81 were diagnosed in women who did not participate in the screening program (10%).
RESULTS: The majority of all HER2 + (59%) and TN cancers (57%) in this age group were detected by screening. Screen-detected HER2 + tumors were small (median 12 mm), and node-negative (84%). During a median follow-up of eight years, the distant disease-free survival of screen-detected HER2 + and TN cancers was better than that of interval and nonparticipant cancers (age-adjusted HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.81 and HR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.79, respectively). In nonparticipants, the distant disease-free survival of these cancers was worse than in participants (age-adjusted HR = 2.52, 95% CI 0.63-10.11 and HR = 5.30, 95% 1.16-24.29, respectively).
CONCLUSION: In the 50-69 age group, the majority of HER2 + and TN cancers can be found by a quality assured population-based mammography screening. Despite their generally aggressive behavior, after a median follow-up of 8 years, distant disease-free survival was over 90% of these cancers detected by screening. The worst prognosis of these cancers was in women who did not participate in screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HER2 positive; Mammography screening; Prognosis; Triple-negative breast cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 33420595     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06060-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  3 in total

1.  Differences in subtype distribution between screen-detected and symptomatic invasive breast cancer and their impact on survival.

Authors:  N Kobayashi; M Hikichi; K Ushimado; A Sugioka; Y Kiriyama; M Kuroda; T Utsumi
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Effect of Mammography Screening on Mortality by Histological Grade.

Authors:  Laszlo Tabar; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Jean Ching-Yuan Fann; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; May M S Ku; Wendy Yi-Ying Wu; Chen-Yang Hsu; Yu-Ying Chen; Kerri Beckmann; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Screening status, tumour subtype, and breast cancer survival: a national population-based analysis.

Authors:  Katie M O'Brien; Therese Mooney; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.872

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups-prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation.

Authors:  H Vihervuori; K Korpinen; T A Autere; H Repo; K Talvinen; P Kronqvist
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.624

2.  Breast Cancer Prevention: Time for Change.

Authors:  Rowan T Chlebowski; Aaron K Aragaki; Kathy Pan
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-07-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.