| Literature DB >> 33419252 |
Donato Angelino1, Alice Rosi2, Emilia Ruggiero3, Daniele Nucci4, Gaetana Paolella5, Veronica Pignone6, Nicoletta Pellegrini7, Daniela Martini8.
Abstract
Bread is one of the most common staple foods, despite the increasing consumption of the so-called "bread substitutes". The aim of the present work is to survey the nutritional quality intended as a nutrition declaration of 339 pre-packed bread products and 1020 bread substitutes sold in the major retailers present on the Italian market. Comparisons of energy, macronutrient, and salt content within product types, and between regular and gluten-free (GF) products and products with or without nutrition claim (NC) and health claim (HC) declarations, were performed. A high inter-product variability was detected. The median energy contents were 274 (interquartile range 255-289) and 412 (380-437) kcal/100 for bread products and substitutes, respectively. Irrespective of the category, GF products had lower amounts of energy than their gluten-containing counterpart (p < 0.001), whereas products carrying NC had lower energy, sugar and salt amounts than the products without these declarations on the pack (p < 0.001 for all). A strong positive correlation was observed between energy and carbohydrate in bread (rho = 0.73, p < 0.001), but not in substitutes (rho = 0.033, p = 0.29). The present work highlighted a high variability in the apparent nutritional quality of bread products and substitutes sold on the Italian market, and suggested that bread alternatives should not be considered tout court as substitutes from a nutritional point of view.Entities:
Keywords: bread; bread substitutes; food labeling; gluten free; nutrition and health claims; nutritional quality
Year: 2020 PMID: 33419252 PMCID: PMC7766686 DOI: 10.3390/foods9121905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158