Literature DB >> 33417648

Chromosomal Analysis of Pre-implantation Embryos: Its Place in Current IVF Practice.

Sadhana K Desai1,2,3, Vijay S Mangoli2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The intersection of ART and molecular genetic science is fast growing. It is now possible to utilize the advances in molecular genetics for clinical application to detect chromosomal aberrations in preimplanting embryos.As molecular genetic techniques have improved, it is now possible to test the complete characterization of human genome variation with reasonable accuracy. In this article, we have tried to summarize the common current indications of chromosomal analysis of preimplanting embryos in couples having various chromosomal dominant or chromosomal recessive heritable disorders leading to the birth of a new born baby with chromosomal aberrations or leading to repeated miscarriage.
CONCLUSION: The currently available techniques of embryo biopsy have their advantages and shortcomings. Today, preimplantation genetic testing to diagnose a euploid embryo is widely used in clinical practice in couples undergoing IVF ET treatment. By eliminating the transfer of aneuploid embryos, the pregnancy rate improves per embryo transfer and it shortens the time of conception from the start of IVF treatment. We have also discussed the current scenario of the place of PGT-A for routine use in IVF treatment procedure in view of the possible risk of losing euploid embryos due to the shortcoming of the embryo biopsy procedure. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; Chromosomal analysis; Common indications; Embryo biopsy; PGT

Year:  2020        PMID: 33417648      PMCID: PMC7758391          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-020-01383-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  22 in total

Review 1.  Clinical management of mosaic results from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) of blastocysts: a committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Can time-lapse parameters predict embryo ploidy? A systematic review.

Authors:  Arnaud Reignier; Jenna Lammers; Paul Barriere; Thomas Freour
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  A fast and efficient method for simultaneous X and Y in situ hybridization of human blastomeres.

Authors:  S Munné; H U Weier; J Stein; J Grifo; J Cohen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  L Voullaire; L Wilton; H Slater; R Williamson
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Detailed investigation into the cytogenetic constitution and pregnancy outcome of replacing mosaic blastocysts detected with the use of high-resolution next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Joshua Blazek; Michael Large; Pedro A Martinez-Ortiz; Haley Nisson; Emmeline Liu; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Andrea Borini; Amie Becker; John Zhang; Susan Maxwell; James Grifo; Dhruti Babariya; Dagan Wells; Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Pre-implantation diagnosis of HPRT-deficient male and carrier female mouse embryos by trophectoderm biopsy.

Authors:  M Monk; A L Muggleton-Harris; E Rawlings; D G Whittingham
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Biopsy of preimplantation mouse embryos: development of micromanipulated embryos and proliferation of single blastomeres in vitro.

Authors:  L J Wilton; A O Trounson
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 8.  The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.

Authors:  Karen Sermon; Antonio Capalbo; Jacques Cohen; Edith Coonen; Martine De Rycke; Anick De Vos; Joy Delhanty; Francesco Fiorentino; Norbert Gleicher; Georg Griesinger; Jamie Grifo; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Georgia Kokkali; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; David Meldrum; Marcos Meseguer; Markus Montag; Santiago Munné; Laura Rienzi; Carmen Rubio; Katherine Scott; Richard Scott; Carlos Simon; Jason Swain; Nathan Treff; Filippo Ubaldi; Rita Vassena; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Willem Verpoest; Dagan Wells; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  ESHRE PGT Consortium good practice recommendations for the organisation of PGT.

Authors:  Filipa Carvalho; Edith Coonen; Veerle Goossens; Georgia Kokkali; Carmen Rubio; Madelon Meijer-Hoogeveen; Céline Moutou; Nathalie Vermeulen; Martine De Rycke
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-05-29

10.  Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Karoline B Kuchenbaecker; John L Hopper; Daniel R Barnes; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Thea M Mooij; Marie-José Roos-Blom; Sarah Jervis; Flora E van Leeuwen; Roger L Milne; Nadine Andrieu; David E Goldgar; Mary Beth Terry; Matti A Rookus; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou; Lesley McGuffog; D Gareth Evans; Daniel Barrowdale; Debra Frost; Julian Adlard; Kai-Ren Ong; Louise Izatt; Marc Tischkowitz; Ros Eeles; Rosemarie Davidson; Shirley Hodgson; Steve Ellis; Catherine Nogues; Christine Lasset; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Laurence Faivre; Pascaline Berthet; Maartje J Hooning; Lizet E van der Kolk; Carolien M Kets; Muriel A Adank; Esther M John; Wendy K Chung; Irene L Andrulis; Melissa Southey; Mary B Daly; Saundra S Buys; Ana Osorio; Christoph Engel; Karin Kast; Rita K Schmutzler; Trinidad Caldes; Anna Jakubowska; Jacques Simard; Michael L Friedlander; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Eva Machackova; Lenka Foretova; Yen Y Tan; Christian F Singer; Edith Olah; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Brita Arver; Håkan Olsson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.