Literature DB >> 33415715

Personal reminders: Self-generated reminders boost memory more than normatively related ones.

Di Zhang1, Jonathan G Tullis2.   

Abstract

People generate reminders in a variety of ways (e.g. putting items in special places or creating to-do lists) to support their memories. Successful remindings can result in retroactive facilitation of earlier information; in contrast, failures to remind can produce interference between memory for related information. Here, we compared the efficacy of different kinds of reminders, including participant's self-generated reminders, reminders created by prior participants, and normatively associated reminders. Self-generated reminders boosted memory for the earlier target words more than normatively associated reminders in recall tests. Reminders generated by others enhanced memory as much as self-generated reminders when we controlled output order during recall. The results suggest that self-generated reminders boost memory for earlier studied information because they distinctly point towards the target information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Generation; Memory; Metacognition; Reminding

Year:  2021        PMID: 33415715     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01120-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Prefrontal cortex and episodic memory retrieval mode.

Authors:  M Lepage; O Ghaffar; L Nyberg; E Tulving
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The effects of free recall testing on subsequent source memory.

Authors:  Gene A Brewer; Richard L Marsh; Joseph T Meeks; Arlo Clark-Foos; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2010-04-19

3.  Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study.

Authors:  Asher Koriat; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Cepeda; Harold Pashler; Edward Vul; John T Wixted; Doug Rohrer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.

Authors:  Jason C K Chan; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

Review 7.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 8.  What makes distributed practice effective?

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin; Jonathan Tullis
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Memory consequences of looking back to notice change: Retroactive and proactive facilitation.

Authors:  Larry L Jacoby; Christopher N Wahlheim; Colleen M Kelley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Effectiveness of self-generated cues in younger and older adults: the role of retention interval.

Authors:  L Bäckman; T Mäntylä
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  1988
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.