Literature DB >> 3170014

Effectiveness of self-generated cues in younger and older adults: the role of retention interval.

L Bäckman1, T Mäntylä.   

Abstract

Younger and older participants generated one or three properties to a set of forty nouns. Immediately after, one week after, or three weeks after this generation phase, the participants received an incidental recall test, in which they were cued with their self-generated properties, and requested to recall the nouns. Although the younger adults recalled more nouns than the older participants in all conditions, both age groups exhibited an extremely high level of immediate recall. In addition, younger and older adults did not differ with respect to the forgetting rate, and both age groups recalled more nouns when three, as compared to one, properties were provided as cues. It is suggested that cue effectiveness is optimized both for younger and older adults when the cues describing the information encoded are compatible and distinctive. Finally, it is emphasized that the individual's idiosyncratic knowledge may serve an important function in attempts at optimizing memory performance of elderly people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3170014     DOI: 10.2190/TQWD-W1AQ-1NV2-P73G

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev        ISSN: 0091-4150


  8 in total

1.  Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

2.  Personal reminders: Self-generated reminders boost memory more than normatively related ones.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Jonathan G Tullis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 3.  Cognitive aging: is there a dark side to environmental support?

Authors:  Ulman Lindenberger; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Communicative value of self cues in aphasia: A re-evaluation.

Authors:  Connie A Tompkins; Victoria L Scharp; Robert C Marshall
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 2.773

5.  Knowing but not remembering: adult age differences in recollective experience.

Authors:  T Mäntylä
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-05

6.  Age related-changes in the neural basis of self-generation in verbal paired associate learning.

Authors:  Jennifer Vannest; Thomas Maloney; Benjamin Kay; Miriam Siegel; Jane B Allendorfer; Christi Banks; Mekibib Altaye; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Rate of forgetting is independent of initial degree of learning.

Authors:  Karim Rivera-Lares; Robert Logie; Alan Baddeley; Sergio Della Sala
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-01-06

Review 8.  Latent tuberculosis: interaction of virulence factors in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Sadhana Sundararajan; Rajiniraja Muniyan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 2.316

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.