Literature DB >> 33415563

Patient and Caregiver Considerations and Priorities When Selecting Hospitals for Complex Cancer Care.

Zhi Ven Fong1, Pei-Wen Lim2, Ryan Hendrix3, Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo4, Ryan D Nipp4, James M Lindberg3, Giles F Whalen3, William Kastrinakis5, Motaz Qadan4, Cristina R Ferrone4, Andrew L Warshaw4, Keith D Lillemoe4, David C Chang4, Lara N Traeger6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare policies have focused on centralizing care to high-volume centers in an effort to optimize patient outcomes; however, little is known about patients' and caregivers' considerations and selection process when selecting hospitals for care. We aim to explore how patients and caregivers select hospitals for complex cancer care and to develop a taxonomy for their selection considerations.
METHODS: This was a qualitative study in which data were gathered from in-depth interviews conducted from March to November 2019 among patients with hepatopancreatobiliary cancers who were scheduled to undergo a pancreatectomy (n = 20) at a metropolitan, urban regional, or suburban medical center and their caregivers (n = 10).
RESULTS: The interviews revealed six broad domains that characterized hospital selection considerations: hospital factors, team characteristics, travel distance to hospital, referral or recommendation, continuity of care, and insurance considerations. The identified domains were similar between participants seen at the metropolitan center and urban/suburban medical centers, with the following exceptions: participants receiving care specifically at the metropolitan center noted operative volume and access to specific services such as clinical trials in their hospital selection; participants receiving care at urban/suburban centers noted health insurance considerations and having access to existing medical records in their hospital selection.
CONCLUSIONS: This study delineates the many considerations of patients and caregivers when selecting hospitals for complex cancer care. These identified domains should be incorporated into the development and implementation of centralization policies to help increase patient access to high-quality cancer care that is consistent with their priorities and needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33415563      PMCID: PMC9123936          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09506-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  35 in total

1.  The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  M N Marshall; P G Shekelle; S Leatherman; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Informing consumer decisions in health care: implications from decision-making research.

Authors:  J H Hibbard; P Slovic; J J Jewett
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Potential impact of a volume pledge on spatial access: A population-level analysis of patients undergoing pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Zhi Ven Fong; Andrew P Loehrer; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Yanik J Bababekov; Ginger Jin; Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; Lara N Traeger; Matthew M Hutter; Keith D Lillemoe; David C Chang
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Simulated Volume-Based Regionalization of Complex Procedures: Impact on Spatial Access to Care.

Authors:  Zhi Ven Fong; Daniel A Hashimoto; Ginger Jin; Alex B Haynes; Numa Perez; Motaz Qadan; Cristina R Ferrone; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Lara N Traeger; David C Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Pancreatic Resection Results in a Statewide Surgical Collaborative.

Authors:  Mark A Healy; Robert W Krell; Zaid M Abdelsattar; Laurence E McCahill; David Kwon; Timothy L Frankel; Samantha Hendren; Darrell A Campbell; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Outcomes Improvement Is Not Continuous Along the Learning Curve for Pancreaticoduodenectomy at the Hospital Level.

Authors:  Taylor M Coe; Zhi Ven Fong; Samuel E Wilson; Mark A Talamini; Keith D Lillemoe; David C Chang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Time to Surgery and Colon Cancer Survival in the United States.

Authors:  Christof Kaltenmeier; Chengli Shen; David S Medich; David A Geller; David L Bartlett; Allan Tsung; Samer Tohme
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 13.787

8.  Preoperative Delays in the Treatment of DCIS and the Associated Incidence of Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  William H Ward; Lyudmila DeMora; Elizabeth Handorf; Elin R Sigurdson; Eric A Ross; John M Daly; Allison A Aggon; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Michelle Hendriks; Jany Rademakers; Diana M J Delnoij; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Why patients may not exercise their choice when referred for hospital care. An exploratory study based on interviews with patients.

Authors:  Aafke Victoor; Diana Delnoij; Roland Friele; Jany Rademakers
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: Impact of Combined Volume of Complex Cancer Operations on Surgical Outcomes in a Low-Volume Setting.

Authors:  Susanna Wl de Geus; Marianna V Papageorge; Alison P Woods; Spencer Wilson; Sing Chau Ng; Andrea Merrill; Michael Cassidy; David McAneny; Jennifer F Tseng; Teviah E Sachs
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.532

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.