Literature DB >> 28504112

Potential impact of a volume pledge on spatial access: A population-level analysis of patients undergoing pancreatectomy.

Zhi Ven Fong1, Andrew P Loehrer2, Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo3, Yanik J Bababekov3, Ginger Jin3, Cristina R Ferrone3, Andrew L Warshaw3, Lara N Traeger4, Matthew M Hutter3, Keith D Lillemoe3, David C Chang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A minimum-volume policy restricting hospitals not meeting the threshold from performing complex operation may increase travel burden and decrease spatial access to operation. We aim to identify vulnerable populations that would be sensitive to an added travel burden.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the database of the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development for patients undergoing pancreatectomy from 2005 to 2014. Number of hospitals bypassed was used as a metric for travel. Patients bypassing fewer hospitals were deemed to be more sensitive to an added travel burden.
RESULTS: There were 13,374 patients who underwent a pancreatectomy, of whom 2,368 (17.7%) were nonbypassers. On unadjusted analysis, patients >80 year old travelled less than their younger counterparts, bypassing a mean of 10.9 ± 9.5 hospitals compared with 14.2 ± 21.3 hospitals bypassed by the 35-49 year old age group (P < .001). Racial minorities travelled less when compared with non-Hispanic whites (P < .001). Patients identifying their payer status as self-pay (8.9 ± 15.6 hospitals bypassed) and Medicaid (10.1 ± 17.2 hospitals bypassed) also travelled less when compared with patients with private insurance (13.8 ± 20.4 hospitals bypassed, P < .001). On multivariate analysis, advanced age, racial minority, and patients with self-pay or Medicaid payer status were associated independently with increased sensitivity to an added travel burden.
CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing pancreatectomy, the elderly, racial minorities, and patients with self-pay or Medicaid payer status were associated with an increased sensitivity to an added travel burden. This vulnerable cohort may be affected disproportionately by a minimum-volume policy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28504112      PMCID: PMC5889083          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  32 in total

1.  The association of payer with utilization of cardiac procedures in Massachusetts.

Authors:  M B Wenneker; J S Weissman; A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-09-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Brian R Englum; Asvin M Ganapathi; Xiaofei Wang; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Regional Variations in the Public Delivery of Bariatric Surgery: An Evaluation of the Center of Excellence Model.

Authors:  Aristithes G Doumouras; Fady Saleh; Scott Gmora; Mehran Anvari; Dennis Hong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The Hidden Consequences of the Volume Pledge: "No Patient Left Behind"?

Authors:  Dana M Schwartz; Zhi Ven Fong; Andrew L Warshaw; Michael J Zinner; David C Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality.

Authors:  Luke M Funk; Atul A Gawande; Marcus E Semel; Stuart R Lipsitz; William R Berry; Michael J Zinner; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Reduced access to care resulting from centers of excellence initiatives in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston; Iain Burchell
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-10

8.  Medicare program; criteria for Medicare coverage of adult liver transplants--HCFA. Final notice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1991-04-12

9.  Comparing perioperative processes of care in high and low mortality centers performing pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Christopher P Scally; Huiying Yin; John D Birkmeyer; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Going the Extra Mile: Improved Survival for Pancreatic Cancer Patients Traveling to High-volume Centers.

Authors:  Michael E Lidsky; Zhifei Sun; Daniel P Nussbaum; Mohamed A Adam; Paul J Speicher; Dan G Blazer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  8 in total

1.  Facility Type is Associated with Margin Status and Overall Survival of Patients with Resected Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Grace C Lee; T Clark Gamblin; Zhi Ven Fong; Cristina R Ferrone; Lipika Goyal; Keith D Lillemoe; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Kenneth K Tanabe; Motaz Qadan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The Potential Impact of "Take the Volume Pledge" on Outcomes After Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Christian Lopez Ramos; Michael G Brandel; Robert C Rennert; Brian R Hirshman; Arvin R Wali; Jeffrey A Steinberg; David R Santiago-Dieppa; Mitchell Flagg; Scott E Olson; J Scott Pannell; Alexander A Khalessi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Geographic Distribution of Adult Inpatient Surgery Capability in the USA.

Authors:  Adrian Diaz; Anna Schoenbrunner; Jordan Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Simulated Volume-Based Regionalization of Complex Procedures: Impact on Spatial Access to Care.

Authors:  Zhi Ven Fong; Daniel A Hashimoto; Ginger Jin; Alex B Haynes; Numa Perez; Motaz Qadan; Cristina R Ferrone; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Lara N Traeger; David C Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Geographic impact on access to care and survival for non-curative esophagogastric cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Elliott K Yee; Natalie G Coburn; Victoria Zuk; Laura E Davis; Alyson L Mahar; Ying Liu; Vaibhav Gupta; Gail Darling; Julie Hallet
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Geographic Disparities in Oncologic Treatment and Outcomes: The Urban-Rural Divide.

Authors:  Adrian Diaz; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-22       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Does the Volume-Outcome Association in Pancreas Cancer Surgery Justify Regionalization of Care? A Review of Current Controversies.

Authors:  Alexandra W Acher; Sharon M Weber; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Patient and Caregiver Considerations and Priorities When Selecting Hospitals for Complex Cancer Care.

Authors:  Zhi Ven Fong; Pei-Wen Lim; Ryan Hendrix; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Ryan D Nipp; James M Lindberg; Giles F Whalen; William Kastrinakis; Motaz Qadan; Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; David C Chang; Lara N Traeger
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.339

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.