Literature DB >> 31449139

Simulated Volume-Based Regionalization of Complex Procedures: Impact on Spatial Access to Care.

Zhi Ven Fong1, Daniel A Hashimoto1, Ginger Jin1, Alex B Haynes1, Numa Perez1, Motaz Qadan1, Cristina R Ferrone1, Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo1, Andrew L Warshaw1, Keith D Lillemoe1, Lara N Traeger2, David C Chang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study simulates the regionalization of pancreatectomies to assess its impact on spatial access in terms of patient driving times.
BACKGROUND: Although policies to regionalize complex procedures to high-volume centers may improve outcomes, the impact on patient access is unknown.
METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreatectomies from 2005 to 2014 were identified from California's statewide database. Round-trip driving times between patients' home ZIP code and hospital addresses were calculated via Google Maps. Regionalization was simulated by eliminating hospitals performing <20 pancreatectomies/yr, and reassigning patients to the next closest hospital that satisfied the volume threshold. Sensitivity analyses were performed for New York and Medicare patients to assess for influence of geography and insurance coverage, respectively.
RESULTS: Of 13,317 pancreatectomies, 6335 (47.6%) were performed by hospitals with <20 cases/yr. Patients traveled a median of 49.8 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 30.8-96.2] per round-trip. A volume-restriction policy would increase median round-trip driving time by 24.1 minutes (IQR 4.5-53.5). Population in-hospital mortality rates were estimated to decrease from 6.7% to 2.8% (P < 0.001). Affected patients were more likely to be racial minorities (44.6% vs 36.5% of unaffected group, P < 0.001) and covered by Medicaid or uninsured (16.3% vs 9.8% of unaffected group, P < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses revealed a 17.8 minutes increment for patients in NY (IQR 0.8-47.4), and 27.0 minutes increment for Medicare patients (IQR 6.2-57.1).
CONCLUSIONS: A policy that limits access to low-volume pancreatectomy hospitals will increase round-trip driving time by 24 minutes, but up to 54 minutes for 25% of patients. Population mortality rates may improve by 1.5%.
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 31449139      PMCID: PMC7032992          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  26 in total

1.  Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Brian R Englum; Asvin M Ganapathi; Xiaofei Wang; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Affordable Care Act's Medicaid Expansion and Use of Regionalized Surgery at High-Volume Hospitals.

Authors:  James McDermott; Alexander Zeymo; Kitty Chan; Afshin Ehsan; Andrew Crocker; David Xiao; Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Thomas DeLeire; Nawar Shara; Waddah Al-Refaie
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  The Hidden Consequences of the Volume Pledge: "No Patient Left Behind"?

Authors:  Dana M Schwartz; Zhi Ven Fong; Andrew L Warshaw; Michael J Zinner; David C Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Factors that influence minority use of high-volume hospitals for colorectal cancer care.

Authors:  Lyen C Huang; Thuy B Tran; Yifei Ma; Justine V Ngo; Kim F Rhoads
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Care fragmentation in the postdischarge period: surgical readmissions, distance of travel, and postoperative mortality.

Authors:  Thomas C Tsai; E John Orav; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Regionalization of hepatic resections is associated with increasing disparities among some patient populations in use of high-volume providers.

Authors:  John E Scarborough; Ricardo Pietrobon; Bryan M Clary; Carlos E Marroquin; Kyla M Bennett; Paul C Kuo; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; W J Hoskins; M F Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Regionalization of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and implications for patient travel distance.

Authors:  Susan M Kansagra; Lesley H Curtis; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Nancy J Marth; David C Goodman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Therese A Stukel; Andrea E Siewers; Philip P Goodney; David E Wennberg; F Lee Lucas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Early trends in ECMO mortality during the first quarters of 2019 and 2020: Could we have predicted the onset of the pandemic?

Authors:  J W Awori Hayanga; Jahnavi Kakuturu; Alper Toker; Fatima Asad; Anthony Siler; Heather Hayanga; Vinay Badhwar
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 1.581

2.  Patient and Caregiver Considerations and Priorities When Selecting Hospitals for Complex Cancer Care.

Authors:  Zhi Ven Fong; Pei-Wen Lim; Ryan Hendrix; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Ryan D Nipp; James M Lindberg; Giles F Whalen; William Kastrinakis; Motaz Qadan; Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; David C Chang; Lara N Traeger
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.339

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.